From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivered-To: chneukirchen@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.140.3 with SMTP id n3cs283995rvd; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 06:48:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 3zhmRSwcLCsQrokns42rokns42.myw1kmu-no5ovqyyqvoq1y4z2.myw@groups.bounces.google.com designates 10.115.100.26 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.115.100.26; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 3zhmRSwcLCsQrokns42rokns42.myw1kmu-no5ovqyyqvoq1y4z2.myw@groups.bounces.google.com designates 10.115.100.26 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=3zhmRSwcLCsQrokns42rokns42.myw1kmu-no5ovqyyqvoq1y4z2.myw@groups.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=3zhmRSwcLCsQrokns42rokns42.myw1kmu-no5ovqyyqvoq1y4z2.myw@groups.bounces.google.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.115.100.26]) by 10.115.100.26 with SMTP id c26mr545272wam.11.1267800527708 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:48:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=KZrL9Hz/hJYIWvKJ2N5B5JIjnfgqtGNmrvLQ012xrBw=; b=ur1aj3I2YeQnWyCRofXGyLv+BCtQUjn4fzlSW5feM73esS22BSeqSVgIQNegQN2KL2 sVcOsMiQCUTE42OQ7K5P+hSuKGnhh5eskOXDTjbpJj9Nu62Q72px7zlvXtqoPZu4xrYL NLrA72Gf0VAZvxq3RyQtNBtqSendxhBeGXqgg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=NVFzTpwFpLgJVIoVWsSFAheZpt/fBz/dV6lCqezejs/FYy/paioRSdpgCeeLVZKRo9 nGEI/rbIhjNJc3xWZNkFF3bTkc1Ag7c4r+tTtrVnDGucs8iRUrDBEK15QgsICGQnTrhA fzIMsjNT84eXVVhlmPlBWUqskfQ1Cof3ygheE= Received: by 10.115.100.26 with SMTP id c26mr66536wam.11.1267800526458; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:48:46 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.114.214.33 with SMTP id m33ls758361wag.0.p; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:48:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.50.15 with SMTP id c15mr230752wak.26.1267800525096; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:48:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.50.15 with SMTP id c15mr230751wak.26.1267800525066; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:48:45 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mail-vw0-f42.google.com (mail-vw0-f42.google.com [209.85.212.42]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 21si523845pxi.6.2010.03.05.06.48.44; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:48:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of headius@headius.com designates 209.85.212.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.42; Received: by vws13 with SMTP id 13so1640354vws.1 for ; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:48:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.128.1 with SMTP id i1mr659152vcs.23.1267800524140; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:48:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Charles Oliver Nutter Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:48:24 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Not cleaning up tempfiles for multipart? To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of headius@headius.com designates 209.85.212.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=headius@headius.com X-Original-Sender: headius@headius.com Reply-To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list rack-devel@googlegroups.com; contact rack-devel+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/t/6eb2bc7a1f8c072c X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/msg/5393071b2fd5af35 Sender: rack-devel@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: > FYI, in JRuby there is no _close, since it's a private impl method and > we have our own tempfile implementation. Actually, I was wrong; we do have _close, but it behaves somewhat differently than MRI. Still seems like it's an internal method that shouldn't be monkeyed with... - Charlie