From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivered-To: chneukirchen@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.141.15 with SMTP id o15cs433181rvd; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:19:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mr.google.com ([10.100.228.1]) by 10.100.228.1 with SMTP id a1mr8230820anh.46.1263853167288 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:19:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.228.1 with SMTP id a1mr493175anh.46.1263853165428; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:19:25 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.154.37 with SMTP id g37ls210541ano.3.p; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:19:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.84.20 with SMTP id h20mr6614240anb.8.1263853163601; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:19:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.84.20 with SMTP id h20mr6614239anb.8.1263853163576; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:19:23 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mail-yx0-f196.google.com (mail-yx0-f196.google.com [209.85.210.196]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 25si544727ywh.0.2010.01.18.14.19.23; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:19:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of headius@headius.com designates 209.85.210.196 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.196; Received: by yxe34 with SMTP id 34so960180yxe.16 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:19:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.52.9 with SMTP id z9mr4237700anz.135.1263853163177; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:19:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Charles Oliver Nutter Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:19:03 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Friends_of_Rack_=E2=88=A9_Friends_of_JRuby_=28was_Re=3A_Ra?= =?UTF-8?Q?ck_test_spec=5Frack=5Fruntime_fails_on_JRuby_due_to_timing=29?= To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of headius@headius.com designates 209.85.210.196 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=headius@headius.com X-Original-Sender: headius@headius.com Reply-To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list rack-devel@googlegroups.com; contact rack-devel+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/t/200889b8e641f0f4 X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/msg/f13107e5753ea460 Sender: rack-devel@googlegroups.com List-Unsubscribe: , List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Interesting failure out of the gate on Ruby 1.8.6...some sort of weird log-processing issue? On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Nick Sieger wrote: > I'm on the Rack list as well, but (bad me) I haven't been diligent > enough to run Rack tests regularly. > > I've got some CI set up for Rack with both Ruby 1.8.6 and JRuby trunk > at http://ci.jruby.org/view/Rack/, we'll see how they go. > > /Nick > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter > wrote: >> If we get this green, I may advocate we set up a CI build for >> JRuby+Rack somewhere. We've got a server (ci.jruby.org) where we could >> put it, and it's obviously a pretty critical piece of infrastructure. >> >> As for JRuby actives on the Rack lists...I'm not sure... >> >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Ryan Tomayko wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter >>> wrote: >>>> This came up because a friend of JRuby is working to prepare a Gentoo >>>> ebuild, and wants to get all related packages running green. >>> >>> Speaking of, are there any friends of JRuby that are active on the >>> rack list? It'd be cool if someone could sign up for ensuring the test >>> suite is green before shipping new releases. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ryan >>> >> >