From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivered-To: chneukirchen@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.141.15 with SMTP id o15cs416909rvd; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:29:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mr.google.com ([10.150.173.4]) by 10.150.173.4 with SMTP id v4mr2058125ybe.35.1263835740642 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:29:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.173.4 with SMTP id v4mr105204ybe.35.1263835738813; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:28:58 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.150.107.23 with SMTP id f23ls870718ybc.0.p; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:28:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.117.32 with SMTP id p32mr1199039ybc.21.1263835725514; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:28:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.117.32 with SMTP id p32mr1199036ybc.21.1263835725476; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:28:45 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mail-yx0-f188.google.com (mail-yx0-f188.google.com [209.85.210.188]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 24si518916ywh.3.2010.01.18.09.28.45; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:28:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of headius@headius.com designates 209.85.210.188 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.188; Received: by yxe26 with SMTP id 26so2542658yxe.4 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:28:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.136.27 with SMTP id o27mr9974687ann.93.1263835724338; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:28:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Charles Oliver Nutter Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:28:24 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Friends_of_Rack_=E2=88=A9_Friends_of_JRuby_=28was_Re=3A_Ra?= =?UTF-8?Q?ck_test_spec=5Frack=5Fruntime_fails_on_JRuby_due_to_timing=29?= To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of headius@headius.com designates 209.85.210.188 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=headius@headius.com X-Original-Sender: headius@headius.com Reply-To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list rack-devel@googlegroups.com; contact rack-devel+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/t/200889b8e641f0f4 X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/msg/fc7ce7c5b5f08081 Sender: rack-devel@googlegroups.com List-Unsubscribe: , List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 If we get this green, I may advocate we set up a CI build for JRuby+Rack somewhere. We've got a server (ci.jruby.org) where we could put it, and it's obviously a pretty critical piece of infrastructure. As for JRuby actives on the Rack lists...I'm not sure... On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Ryan Tomayko wrote: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter > wrote: >> This came up because a friend of JRuby is working to prepare a Gentoo >> ebuild, and wants to get all related packages running green. > > Speaking of, are there any friends of JRuby that are active on the > rack list? It'd be cool if someone could sign up for ensuring the test > suite is green before shipping new releases. > > Thanks, > Ryan >