3082 W. Maple Loop Dr
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:50, James Tucker
<jftucker@gmail.com> wrote:
On 13 Aug 2009, at 18:49, Joshua Peek wrote:
Here are a few candidates I'd like to see moved into rack-contrib.
Adapter::Camping
Auth::OpenID
ContentType
Recursive
Session::Memcache
Whilst I sort of agree, doesn't this just shift the bloat problem somewhere else?
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Matt Todd<chiology@gmail.com> wrote:
I was talking to a friend of mine yesterday and he mentioned that thought
the Rack package itself seemed to be slightly bloated by things like Basic
Auth et al. He mentioned two things I thought were interesting and I wanted
to get your feedback on it:
1. Like Merb, Rack probably could benefit from using a core and more
separation of functionality, and
2. Rack core should only include what's necessary for Rack::Lint to validate
a basic application at minimum.
Thoughts?
Matt
--
Matt Todd
Highgroove Studios
www.highgroove.com
cell: 404-314-2612
blog: maraby.org
Scout - Web Monitoring and Reporting Software
www.scoutapp.com
--
Joshua Peek