From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivered-To: chneukirchen@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.190.149 with SMTP id di21cs46603qcb; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 22:46:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rack-devel+bncCPPy_u6JBxDBk-DsBBoEwF9tGA@googlegroups.com designates 10.216.143.225 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.216.143.225; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rack-devel+bncCPPy_u6JBxDBk-DsBBoEwF9tGA@googlegroups.com designates 10.216.143.225 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rack-devel+bncCPPy_u6JBxDBk-DsBBoEwF9tGA@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=rack-devel+bncCPPy_u6JBxDBk-DsBBoEwF9tGA@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.216.143.225]) by 10.216.143.225 with SMTP id l75mr1700939wej.11.1301809603648 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:46:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:x-en-origoutip :x-en-impsid:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-en-userinfo:x-en-authuser:sender:x-en-origip :x-en-orighost:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=7TZYvPxjM2GlQfWWmShMkE1ZSfNmV7lzPK9WdGUAkJk=; b=jRJfjTEZyfc2J0vBsYzAWO0GeuL57JmLTqWYWmbFpe/1bsW3htM4SzMBPcdeWhL3fn VBJbfdLCGGevfnLqtXS+4xTzk0Y3YLmFPFHxhDJa99S98mW1NXeYvw9YS/jnLZvLGQKT a2QQh8mYk9pe1aawYmXCOlrE4gH7S/0qURFI0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-en-origoutip:x-en-impsid:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-en-userinfo:x-en-authuser:sender:x-en-origip:x-en-orighost :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=mRs/a4lIHvAxJlEm7u+1QyAu3VWn1C9PFCHwaR6MLQyq9xU8CEZ4EuDZHWlT41w5Is mDAwlwzqaSxDbz0k+oX7i/JKqniJ89XuZCKgdWKgeAFKRKYJDndnX8uysO773YF09t2F yY9Gzw53NH9w1hUymfPrIpHG/NY5aZOBqiTpU= Received: by 10.216.143.225 with SMTP id l75mr474738wej.11.1301809601940; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:46:41 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.143.86 with SMTP id k64ls1681935wej.3.p; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.246.6 with SMTP id p6mr357484wer.5.1301809600594; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.223.24 with SMTP id u24mswep; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 20:41:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.97.78 with SMTP id k14mr731004fan.13.1301802093645; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 20:41:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.97.78 with SMTP id k14mr731003fan.13.1301802093619; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 20:41:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout04.yourhostingaccount.com (mailout04.yourhostingaccount.com [65.254.253.32]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id z10si393453fam.5.2011.04.02.20.41.32; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 20:41:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of SRS0=XctHhB=W3=stjohnstudios.com=chris@yourhostingaccount.com designates 65.254.253.32 as permitted sender) client-ip=65.254.253.32; Received: from mailscan14.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.15.14] helo=mailscan14.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailout04.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1Q6EBw-000202-0C for rack-devel@googlegroups.com; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 23:41:32 -0400 Received: from impout03.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.55.3] helo=impout03.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailscan14.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1Q6EBw-0000k3-1V for rack-devel@googlegroups.com; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 23:41:32 -0400 Received: from authsmtp03.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.3]) by impout03.yourhostingaccount.com with NO UCE id SrhX1g00303yUm20000000; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 23:41:31 -0400 X-EN-OrigOutIP: 10.1.18.3 X-EN-IMPSID: SrhX1g00303yUm20000000 Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]) by authsmtp03.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtpa (Exim) id 1Q6EBv-000546-L2 for rack-devel@googlegroups.com; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 23:41:31 -0400 Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so3994360qwg.17 for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 20:41:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.49.209 with SMTP id w17mr4589667qcf.170.1301802090350; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 20:41:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.79.198 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 20:41:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6f165bc8-3999-49d7-b0b4-48dec3ebd134@o21g2000prh.googlegroups.com> References: <6f165bc8-3999-49d7-b0b4-48dec3ebd134@o21g2000prh.googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 23:41:30 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: using Memcached or Redis inside Rack? Wise? From: "Chris St. John" To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com X-EN-UserInfo: 97f36acc7eef731581dcb8b7fca623f7:80f3e75766038f62d470f0c05f29c004 X-EN-AuthUser: chris@stjohnstudios.com Sender: rack-devel@googlegroups.com X-EN-OrigIP: 209.85.216.44 X-EN-OrigHost: mail-qw0-f44.google.com X-Original-Sender: chris@stjohnstudios.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of SRS0=XctHhB=W3=stjohnstudios.com=chris@yourhostingaccount.com designates 65.254.253.32 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=SRS0=XctHhB=W3=stjohnstudios.com=chris@yourhostingaccount.com Reply-To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list rack-devel@googlegroups.com; contact rack-devel+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 486215384060 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636426c5529c7b0049ffb6b4b --001636426c5529c7b0049ffb6b4b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sounds like a good plan to me. In this case, Rails is just a big rack app with a lot of things you wouldn't be using. On Apr 2, 2011 11:12 PM, "Ned" wrote: > Hi > > I have a rails application that redirects based on information in a > memcached or redis store > > It does this for every request > > I'd like to move that logic to Rack so I can keep it as low level as > possible (Yes I realise Rails makes this very easy and it might be > more appropriate... but this really is low level conditional logic) > > Thing is, I can't see any blogs from people using Memcached or Redis > from inside Rack. > > Is it just not done? --001636426c5529c7b0049ffb6b4b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sounds like a good plan to me. =A0In this case, Rails is just a big rack= app with a lot of things you wouldn't be using.

On Apr 2, 2011 11:12 PM, "Ned" <rails.nerd@gmail.com= > wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a r= ails application that redirects based on information in a
> memcached or redis store
>
> It does this for every reque= st
>
> I'd like to move that logic to Rack so I can keep i= t as low level as
> possible (Yes I realise Rails makes this very eas= y and it might be
> more appropriate... but this really is low level conditional logic)>
> Thing is, I can't see any blogs from people using Memcac= hed or Redis
> from inside Rack.
>
> Is it just not done= ?
--001636426c5529c7b0049ffb6b4b--