From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivered-To: chneukirchen@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.143.3 with SMTP id r3csp1507832lfd; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 13:39:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.70.95.230 with SMTP id dn6mr30559778pdb.30.1440275993037; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 13:39:53 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-x239.google.com (mail-pd0-x239.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400e:c02::239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b4si19797083pde.130.2015.08.22.13.39.51 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 22 Aug 2015 13:39:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rack-devel+bncBCR75BPVVQMRBFV44OXAKGQEEYLQV7I@googlegroups.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c02::239 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400e:c02::239; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rack-devel+bncBCR75BPVVQMRBFV44OXAKGQEEYLQV7I@googlegroups.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c02::239 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rack-devel+bncBCR75BPVVQMRBFV44OXAKGQEEYLQV7I@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=@googlegroups.com; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-pd0-x239.google.com with SMTP id c12sf12675677pdj.0; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 13:39:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version:content-type :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=N0bujMVWnT7+ae2pUrko1YLiu3oGTXGRHuIIPbXzt9s=; b=Fv+/3vxrXcbo7KoSAMhF3flzV2t4YoCHl4GgkUWwrLwe65TbnvFSL+dPftnRbV9e6O rULcPXX1NvLETD8V++TwgGZmBiPKncOQ52ssXDUtXCl3Qq4vUNETcTYmFWKOPiceIK9n Xfo/6WEBe+sLF7bCFui1wMeU7XOb6vK/f+IvtBe8URVTSGnkS7dmvVMa6mgSTwogftnK NNNbByaSgCRwkzvl8JqKtsPWDPjM7KqEzQ7PDWNpPz9mZL/DT8XzaKw/06xKTUOzzl0z /46AZKG05IBeqZ5Appfh0JswmoHquigHH3KGKqpElCgVeJR41d/lOnKzxCLQ9PYTktrr /ZFA== X-Received: by 10.50.50.167 with SMTP id d7mr150321igo.10.1440275991524; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 13:39:51 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.107.131.17 with SMTP id f17ls1088501iod.24.gmail; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 13:39:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.138.72 with SMTP id qo8mr9908789igb.5.1440275990959; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 13:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.225.2 with SMTP id rg2msigc; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 10:58:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.138.70 with SMTP id qo6mr146018igb.13.1440266297494; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 10:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 10:58:16 -0700 (PDT) From: David Unric To: Rack Development Message-Id: <9d5cc646-0803-42c3-b118-f54a4cf8c6c0@googlegroups.com> Subject: Rack and memory usage ? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_660_269490379.1440266296589" X-Original-Sender: dunric29a@gmail.com Reply-To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list rack-devel@googlegroups.com; contact rack-devel+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 486215384060 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , ------=_Part_660_269490379.1440266296589 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_661_461152567.1440266296589" ------=_Part_661_461152567.1440266296589 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, I'm asking if am I doing something wrong or is normal for a minimal rack application have memory footprint over 25 MiB ? I'd like to reduce the memory usage as possible for deployment of a Sinatra app on small x86 Linux NAS device. I did measured the memory usage and Rack occupies about excessive 26 from total of 31 MiB (the rest is Thin server + the app). Is there some Rack-lite or some trick how to shake-off unnecessary code to get it on diet ? Thanks. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rack Development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rack-devel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_661_461152567.1440266296589 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

I'm asking if am I doing something wrong or= is normal for a minimal rack application have memory footprint over 25 MiB= ?

I'd like to reduce the memory usage as possible for deploymen= t of a Sinatra app on small x86 Linux NAS device. I did measured the memory= usage and Rack occupies about excessive 26 from total of 31 MiB (the rest = is Thin server + the app).

Is there some Rack-lite or some trick how= to shake-off unnecessary code to get it on diet ?

Thanks.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Rack Development" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to rack-dev= el+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_661_461152567.1440266296589-- ------=_Part_660_269490379.1440266296589--