From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivered-To: chneukirchen@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.72.79 with SMTP id l15cs695105bkj; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:59:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of grbounce-ceibQwUAAAB4YPBqaDIjI2bFOCxyyh3G=chneukirchen=gmail.com@googlegroups.com designates 10.220.68.201 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.220.68.201; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of grbounce-ceibQwUAAAB4YPBqaDIjI2bFOCxyyh3G=chneukirchen=gmail.com@googlegroups.com designates 10.220.68.201 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=grbounce-ceibQwUAAAB4YPBqaDIjI2bFOCxyyh3G=chneukirchen=gmail.com@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=grbounce-ceibQwUAAAB4YPBqaDIjI2bFOCxyyh3G=chneukirchen=gmail.com@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.220.68.201]) by 10.220.68.201 with SMTP id w9mr431439vci.15.1250060369209 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:59:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:received:date :in-reply-to:x-ip:references:user-agent:x-http-useragent:message-id :subject:from:to:x-google-approved:reply-to:sender:precedence :x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-unsubscribe:x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; bh=yqykStdwBFQ7mEDDjw65dtpMLpxlscJc9mAsNUp4JX0=; b=n5XtMN/GaO+4+uCMsEfRr9fYYtmmJl6eTxlkTy2xtJGnhE/pxtvShSy4ThHrhm3ZGs iM1CNRdOz4mnOt/RFnQ6aUazsjboNrhy0enZQpWCzMeThkaNC31YhrHtJFc2iAz2XM8/ jB7rulK7CGIps0nOcVrBvxhMMqmNrhKOWjVMc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-sender:x-apparently-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:date:in-reply-to:x-ip:references :user-agent:x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to :x-google-approved:reply-to:sender:precedence:x-google-loop :mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-unsubscribe :x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; b=Yj4MTxYDzm4B445Nwb3Rzeorvx1dxZrX8V7RqnkOvEFc2QwSojm5DY9j/7BwKaW7xl WISLoFeY5K9N7GWy/DSH7aUsfWbzo0+3itPgJ6rDUN3zPgvukhmJFPk1Jt9bwXSWp09i CZdN8tBXmuAYod7mgfI4Ac51F2Rp+8QKuB9lE= Received: by 10.220.68.201 with SMTP id w9mr63857vci.15.1250060368789; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:59:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.177.38.34 with SMTP id q34gr1569yqj.0; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:59:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Sender: subjective@gmail.com X-Apparently-To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received: by 10.151.141.2 with SMTP id t2mr1808668ybn.1.1250054009923; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:13:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <06b05b4f-99be-4479-91fe-e24741dc6457@z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com> X-IP: 115.64.45.143 References: <20090718222513.GA31002@dcvr.yhbt.net> <5062a5fb-7385-4e8f-aeb9-6b61c9e305d0@n11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <06b05b4f-99be-4479-91fe-e24741dc6457@z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.2) Gecko/20090729 Firefox/3.5.2,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Message-ID: <94690572-f32a-44e1-b348-769966b56ddb@i4g2000prm.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Tempfile#unlink changes in Ruby 1.9.1-p152 From: Taylor luk To: Rack Development X-Google-Approved: scytrin@gmail.com via web at 2009-08-12 06:59:25 Reply-To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Sender: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Precedence: bulk X-Google-Loop: groups Mailing-List: list rack-devel@googlegroups.com; contact rack-devel+owner@googlegroups.com List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: , X-BeenThere-Env: rack-devel@googlegroups.com X-BeenThere: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Hi guys, I think this is not getting enough attention as it deserves, The issue isn't about people using svn trunk release of ruby, But Ruby 1.9.1- p243 which is the latest stable version of ruby people can download from http://ruby-lang.org Passenger issue tracker have marked this issue invalid in their bug tracker,I have tried patch described in the links above and no success. Tempfile class is been patched in Rack. Perphas the upcoming 1.0.1 release, Anyone who can provide some status update or point me to the right direction ? Cheers.. Taylor Luk On Aug 8, 3:49=A0pm, Taylor luk wrote: > I have the same problem with Ruby 1.9 + Passenger, > > Is there any chance that the workaround provided above will be > included in the coming 1.0.1 release ? > > On Jul 23, 12:41=A0am, Niels Ganser wrote: > > > Presumably so. I'll wait until the weekend to see if there's activity > > on the bug report [1] and, if there isn't any, then bring this to the > > attention of ruby-core to see what can be done. > > > Will report back here. > > > - Niels. > > > [1]http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1494 > > > 2009/7/22 Hongli Lai : > > > > It seems that this issue still exists in 1.9.1-p243: > > >http://code.google.com/p/phusion-passenger/issues/detail?id=3D340 > > > > Are they going to fix it? > >