From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zorya.localdomain (dslb-188-110-168-125.pools.arcor-ip.net [188.110.168.125]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n7sm647258fam.11.2011.02.11.14.15.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:15:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by zorya.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 58F6B957A6; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:15:25 +0100 (CET) From: Christian Neukirchen To: rack-core@googlegroups.com Cc: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Rack 1.1.1.pre, and notes on other potential releases References: <1B0F767C-EF74-4684-B784-6659BA3A0854@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:15:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1B0F767C-EF74-4684-B784-6659BA3A0854@gmail.com> (James Tucker's message of "Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:24:09 -0800") Message-ID: <87ipwqcj5u.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii James Tucker writes: > Hi All, > > I have just pushed rack-1.1.1.pre. It's effectively up for rails testing (as they need it for the 2.x series release). I'm planning on pushing the same code base in roughly 24H if no issues arise. +1 > There's more patch backlog to get through as well, that I'm well aware of. I'm also considering to make life easier, we might want to start phasing out Lighthouse. At this point it still has some valuable resources though, so we should get those enacted first. +1 > Apologies to the rails folks for the long wait, and thanks for being patient. > > Regards, > > James Tucker Thank you very much for your efforts! -- Christian Neukirchen http://chneukirchen.org