From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivered-To: chneukirchen@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.99.8 with SMTP id w8cs86223fgb; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of grbounce-ceibQwUAAAB4YPBqaDIjI2bFOCxyyh3G=chneukirchen=gmail.com@googlegroups.com designates 10.229.111.142 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.229.111.142; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of grbounce-ceibQwUAAAB4YPBqaDIjI2bFOCxyyh3G=chneukirchen=gmail.com@googlegroups.com designates 10.229.111.142 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=grbounce-ceibQwUAAAB4YPBqaDIjI2bFOCxyyh3G=chneukirchen=gmail.com@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=grbounce-ceibQwUAAAB4YPBqaDIjI2bFOCxyyh3G=chneukirchen=gmail.com@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.229.111.142]) by 10.229.111.142 with SMTP id s14mr3377520qcp.0.1254773802000 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:16:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to :received:received:received:received-spf:received:dkim-signature :domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:reply-to:sender :precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-unsubscribe:x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; bh=/jJlgFW/LeT2vW8/2eLOZ2LeKZY8f80NO2MW1YDRl2o=; b=Afmi285HAh9lk0WhhOn6E+3S5zNwO/+kzNyMkMEx5OSAVpubgq8O2xQ2G32dgSl4it WQTmKl634ZksYgjHNb+UaZP9+NaYF+2Uv2bmticxo/thTlFksYZXQDPko3xUYpcPOYsP p+HN5xuQ9ImsVkYjpIYRNqRCwZ0VF1FfY3HFQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-sender:x-apparently-to:received-spf:authentication-results :dkim-signature:domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:reply-to :sender:precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post :list-help:list-unsubscribe:x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; b=EkUxzRynYK64q9tMXA4yvIdPWPa6Sg6G21+EVXEiRoPJ/UZPAwdnjNx/x34SGfVI61 taTFCqhWFjwC6/hbXsmN9NfOGdaix9ZUmTYydomi9QGlljlmWsJLcTFViUQz95J3dSKn iiuSb19BWWizlgr2/5UNyZAjy2THbINr0Og58= Received: by 10.229.111.142 with SMTP id s14mr355002qcp.0.1254773801942; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:16:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.230.17.76 with SMTP id r12gr1675vba.0; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:14:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Sender: scytrin@gmail.com X-Apparently-To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.114.134 with SMTP id e6mr2010039vcq.22.1254773660787; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:14:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.114.134 with SMTP id e6mr2010038vcq.22.1254773660751; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:14:20 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mail-qy0-f192.google.com (mail-qy0-f192.google.com [209.85.221.192]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 22si421634vws.6.2009.10.05.13.14.19; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:14:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of scytrin@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.192 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.221.192; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of scytrin@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.192 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=scytrin@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so3762586qyk.7 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:14:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=yUxKLTcpzNUuWWsuMs72wWxn738TtYIBM6Ok/+N/RaQ=; b=a6yoxfsfva7j2gEVymGH433rJAqMuE3pC18cLoi9fkoYf+Qs4j+QFZKy5IbdyCm2Yo A3u/AYWpobk1Tujn5VePE+GffgoemO+rd7cg7RqpTCro8M7B4ck9kfWAF42kTK0uukX8 7Qm4T1eaFCimzBTmK5L01X6+6rcT9AAT2kWBY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=clcjj4Nu4M7rl0rMm1UP4dpOnYeSF3O7K3Y2NDoCw6zo++mgQUqFPgg0UnTjYxcqJ9 R+hYFZejfgFmfat5ovcaK1LEmONhOvNjBsN96HwNXN42msRw2+ZQKLXhqVsazkV7uM26 Hw0y2AvwKLRMCdt2SamSad1sI6aK4om3GfIWs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.106.207 with SMTP id y15mr626233qao.14.1254773659370; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:14:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:14:19 -0700 Message-ID: <5a9d52bd0910051314t75865792xf1ea7e5b92c5d5cd@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Rack 1.0.1 maintenance release From: Scytrin dai Kinthra To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f986a0d3d84ac047535c2e2 Reply-To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Sender: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Precedence: bulk X-Google-Loop: groups Mailing-List: list rack-devel@googlegroups.com; contact rack-devel+owner@googlegroups.com List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: , X-BeenThere-Env: rack-devel@googlegroups.com X-BeenThere: rack-devel@googlegroups.com --00c09f986a0d3d84ac047535c2e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Moving the openid stuff into rack-contrib for 1.1 sounds good. I am on a vacation till the end of next week so as soon as I finish some personal things I can do the migrations. Additionally, as memcached ruby gem seems to be more stable with 0.17, I plan on evaluating using that rather the memcache-client, unless there are any objections. -- stadik.net On Aug 3, 2009 4:00 PM, "Christian Neukirchen" wrote: [Sorry for being rather inactive lately, my real life is too busy. ;)] Joshua Peek writes: > I'd like to do a 1.0.1 maintenance soon of the rack-1.0 ... This is a good idea. When you consider it ready, I can write an announcement and do a formal release on Rubyforge and my servers. > I went though most of the Lighthouse tickets and only found one that > really concerned 1.0. > > ... I'm open for Rack 1.1 suggestions. 1.1-discussed things can be merged into master now. I have more time to do a release cycle in the next few weeks, so if we merge quickly, we can push a 1.1 pretty soon. blink, do you still want to split the openid parts? 1.1 would be a good juncture. Thanks to everyone, -- Christian Neukirchen http://chneukirchen.org --00c09f986a0d3d84ac047535c2e2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Moving the openid stuff into rack-contrib for 1.1 sounds good. I am on a= vacation till the end of next week so as soon as I finish some personal th= ings I can do the migrations.

Additionally, as memcached ruby gem seems to be more stable with 0.17, I= plan on evaluating using that rather the memcache-client, unless there are= any objections.

--
stadik.net

On Aug 3, 2009 4:00 PM, "Christian Neukir= chen" <chneukirchen@gmail= .com> wrote:


[Sorry for being rather inactive lately, my real life is too busy. ;)]

Joshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com&= gt; writes: > I'd like to do a 1.0.1 maintenance soon of the rack-1.0 ...=

This is a good idea. =C2=A0When you consider it ready, I can write an announcement and do a formal release on Rubyforge and my servers.

> I went though most of the Lighthouse tickets and only found one that > really concerned 1.0. > > ...

I'm open for Rack 1.1 suggestions. =C2=A01.1-discuss= ed things can be merged
into master now.

I have more time to do a release cycle in the next few weeks, so if we
merge quickly, we can push a 1.1 pretty soon.

blink, do you still want to split the openid parts? =C2=A01.1 would be a good juncture.

Thanks to everyone,
--
Christian Neukirchen =C2=A0<ch= neukirchen@gmail.com> =C2=A0http://chneukirchen.org

--00c09f986a0d3d84ac047535c2e2--