rack-devel archive mirror (unofficial) https://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Neil Matatall <neil.matatall@gmail.com>
To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Session collisions on rails 3.1rc4 (authlogic, omniauth, memcache store, passenger)
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:12:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59F7C873-D385-4F24-9EBC-37E219C452C0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8F93F290D08845C89C2A7C1519A9138B@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2607 bytes --]


Thank you, I will investigate and report back.


On Jul 25, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Joshua Ballanco wrote:

> Have you considered the possibility that memcache might be recycling keys on you?
> We had an issue a while back where we were using memcache for both fragment caching and session storage. Occasionally, we would get exceptions in retrieving a session, and looking at the error message it was clear that what was retrieved from memcache was a fragment and not a session. Unfortunately, we moved back to a cookie-based session store before we had a chance to look deeper into the issue. What I can say is that based on the key generation scheme we were using for sessions and cache keys, there was effectively 0 chance that we were duplicating keys. Instead, it seemed like memcache was re-using slots for different keys when we started exhausting free slots.
> Hope that helps!
> - Joshua Ballanco
> On Monday, July 25, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Neil wrote:
>> While it's entirely possible that this issue is caused by some other
>> factor, but we are getting session collisions as well as an issue
>> where one user is getting another user's session. This is clearly
>> bad, but I cannot for the life of me figure out how this could even
>> happen in the first place. The code looks thread safe to me, and a
>> quick discussion on #ruby-lang seems to support that.
>> Thoughts:
>> 1. Session IDs are being generated in the same sequence (uses
>> securerandom -> openssl which does not have a static seed)
>> 2. Threads. Looks good to me.
>> 3. Maybe memcached is returning something other than "STORED/
>> NOT_STORED" for @pool.add(sid, session), but the operation still
>> succeeded?
>> 4. Gnomes.
>> Any input is GREATLY appreciated. Please don't say "it's an RC, what
>> do you expect?" :)
>> From https://github.com/rack/rack/blob/master/lib/rack/session/memcache.rb
>> def generate_sid
>> loop do
>> sid = super
>> break sid unless @pool.get(sid, true)
>> end
>> end
>> def get_session(env, sid)
>> with_lock(env, [nil, {}]) do
>> unless sid and session = @pool.get(sid)
>> sid, session = generate_sid, {}
>> unless /^STORED/ =~ @pool.add(sid, session)
>> raise "Session collision on '#{sid.inspect}'"
>> end
>> end
>> [sid, session]
>> end
>> end
>> def set_session(env, session_id, new_session, options)
>> expiry = options[:expire_after]
>> expiry = expiry.nil? ? 0 : expiry + 1
>> with_lock(env, false) do
>> @pool.set session_id, new_session, expiry
>> session_id
>> end
>> end

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3682 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-25 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-25 18:22 Neil
2011-07-25 20:23 ` Joshua Ballanco
2011-07-25 21:12   ` Neil Matatall [this message]
2011-07-28 19:54   ` Neil Matatall
2011-08-03 10:32     ` Joshua Ballanco
2011-08-04 23:26       ` James Tucker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information: https://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59F7C873-D385-4F24-9EBC-37E219C452C0@gmail.com \
    --to=rack-devel@googlegroups.com \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:


This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).