On 13 Aug 2009, at 18:55, Adrian Madrid wrote:

> I don't think that rack is bloated considering the bloat is only  
> self-inflicted (autoload as mentioned) but Yahuda brings another  
> point: performance. I would love to have response more performant  
> for everyone to use.

As long as it's profiled off of real style applications, and profile  
guided, sure, that would be lovely.

>
>
> Adrian Madrid
> My eBiz, Developer
> 3082 W. Maple Loop Dr
> Lehi, UT 84043
> 801-341-3824
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:50, James Tucker <jftucker@gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
>
> On 13 Aug 2009, at 18:49, Joshua Peek wrote:
>
>
> Here are a few candidates I'd like to see moved into rack-contrib.
>
> Adapter::Camping
> Auth::OpenID
> ContentType
> Recursive
> Session::Memcache
>
> Whilst I sort of agree, doesn't this just shift the bloat problem  
> somewhere else?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Matt Todd<chiology@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was talking to a friend of mine yesterday and he mentioned that  
> thought
> the Rack package itself seemed to be slightly bloated by things like  
> Basic
> Auth et al. He mentioned two things I thought were interesting and I  
> wanted
> to get your feedback on it:
> 1. Like Merb, Rack probably could benefit from using a core and more
> separation of functionality, and
> 2. Rack core should only include what's necessary for Rack::Lint to  
> validate
> a basic application at minimum.
> Thoughts?
> Matt
> --
> Matt Todd
> Highgroove Studios
> www.highgroove.com
> cell: 404-314-2612
> blog: maraby.org
>
> Scout - Web Monitoring and Reporting Software
> www.scoutapp.com
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Joshua Peek
>
>