Re: Use a different name instead of 'call' ?

[Daniel N <has.sox@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1435 bytes --]

Hi,

The strength of rack is that it's a common standard.  A rack application
must respond to call, and receive an argument, the environment.

If you were to create middleware with a different entry method, how would
the calling middleware know what to call?  The standard says to call the
"call" method, thus, all middleware know how to execute all middleware /
applications.  By changing the names of methods, you're not not able to call
it.

If your application absolutely _must_ implement a call method, then you'll
need to wrap it.  If a module you're including defines a call method, then
you'll need to divorce that from the actual middleware container.

Your middleware can be a very simple wrapper around your object, but in
order to work the interface for rack must be preserved.

HTH
Daniel

On 20 February 2010 09:22, Guoliang Cao <gcao99@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm relatively new here. Please forgive me if this has been asked
> before.
>
> I'm wondering if it is possible to name 'call' differently in my
> middleware. Because 'call' is a relatively popular name and in case it
> is already used in one of the modules I included, I have to create a
> wrapper for my middleware. It'll be perfect if I can do something like
> this:
>
> class MyMiddleware
>  def rack_call_method
>     :my_rack_call
>  end
>
>  def my_rack_call env
>     # my middleware implementation goes here
>  end
> end
>
> Thank you.
>
> Cao
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1970 bytes --]