Re: Lighttpd's FastCGI Environment

[Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2122 bytes --]

That is definitely the intention. This should be fixed in the rack lighty
adapter.
-- Yehuda

On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 3:17 AM, Martin Boese <boesemar@googlemail.com>wrote:

>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Magnus Holm <judofyr@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > There is another know issue with Lighttpd:
> http://github.com/rack/rack/blob/master/KNOWN-ISSUES
> >
> > Maybe they're related?
> >
> > //Magnus Holm
>
> Thanks, yes that sounds related.
>
> I was hoping that Rack will give me a standard set of environments no
> matter in which technologie the applicaion is deployed at the end.
> But I guess that should be fixed in Lighttpd's cgi implementation
> instead...
>
> Martin
>
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 16:37, bones <boesemar@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> I am porting my application from ruby fcgi to rack which is in
> >> production using the Lighttpd webserver.
> >>
> >> I noticed that lighttpd doesn't send PATH_INFO or QUERY_STRING so I
> >> used to patch it by reconstructing it from REQUEST_URI. Now with Rack
> >> I have exactly the same situation. Rack::Request.GET is empty. This
> >> fix on the environment makes it working:
> >>
> >> class RackApp
> >>
> >>  def fix_env(ec)
> >>       if (ec['PATH_INFO'].to_s.empty?) then
> >>          pi =  ec['REQUEST_URI']
> >>          pi = pi[0..(pi.index('?')-1)] if pi.include?('?')
> >>          ec['PATH_INFO'] = pi
> >>       end
> >>
> >>       if (ec['QUERY_STRING'].to_s.empty?) then
> >>          ec['QUERY_STRING'] = ec['REQUEST_URI'].include?('?') ?
> >>              ec['REQUEST_URI'].scan(/.?\?(.*)/)[0][0] :
> >>              ""
> >>       end
> >>       ec
> >>  end
> >>
> >>  def call(env)
> >>    Rack::Request.new(fix_env(env))
> >>   # [...]
> >>  end
> >> end
> >>
> >>
> >> As far as I know Lighttpd and Rails (which used Rack?!) is a popular
> >> combination - so I am quiet surprised that I don't find anything
> >> related on the web. Especially - shouldn't that be implemented into
> >> Rack's CGI/FastCGI Handler?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Martin
> >
> >
>



-- 
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3248 bytes --]