From: Aaron Patterson <aaron@tenderlovemaking.com>
To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Unicorn/Rainbows!/Zbatery "support" in rack.git...
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:20:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110414162044.GA13757@higgins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110414083602.GA17769@dcvr.yhbt.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1587 bytes --]
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 08:36:02AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> Hello, I'm the main support/helpdesk guy and project leader for
> Unicorn/Rainbows!/Zbatery servers. I believe
> dff8e34f43c2897062d5b252406398ced2d360a8 to add handlers for these
> servers is a bad change for everyone.
>
> All three servers support Rack natively and were designed around the
> Rack spec. However the (sometimes minor) differences in using "rackup"
> vs the shipped commands will cause confusion among both users and
> developers trying to support them.
>
> All three servers also rely on Unix signals for management, so their
> names in the process table is also an important part of the user
> experience.
>
> Unlike typical web servers, Unicorn should never be directly exposed to
> slow clients, but a user just trying it with "rackup" would never be
> informed of that (especially since other servers like
> Mongrel/Thin/WEBrick don't have this limitation).
>
> Rainbows! and Zbatery are also completely worthless without a
> configuration file, but "rackup" has no way of conveying that to the
> user. The user would just be left with an even worse version
> of Unicorn.
>
>
> I'm also under the impression that nobody uses Rainbows! or Zbatery,
> yet, so I'd rather users' first impressions of those projects be
> through the officially-supported and documented commands.
>
> Thanks for reading, I hope you agree and revert the change.
Hi Eric,
I've reverted the commit. Thanks for letting us know.
--
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-14 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-14 8:36 Unicorn/Rainbows!/Zbatery "support" in rack.git Eric Wong
2011-04-14 16:20 ` Aaron Patterson [this message]
2011-04-14 19:48 ` Eric Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110414162044.GA13757@higgins \
--to=rack-devel@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).