From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivered-To: chneukirchen@gmail.com Received: by 10.142.191.1 with SMTP id o1cs13348wff; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:19:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mr.google.com ([10.91.100.14]) by 10.91.100.14 with SMTP id c14mr896307agm.5.1260490796909 (num_hops = 1); Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:19:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.91.100.14 with SMTP id c14mr135208agm.5.1260490795332; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:19:55 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.213.104.96 with SMTP id n32ls379813ebo.1.p; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:19:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.110.208 with SMTP id o16mr71610ebp.27.1260490793806; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:19:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.110.208 with SMTP id o16mr71609ebp.27.1260490793770; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:19:53 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mail-ew0-f217.google.com (mail-ew0-f217.google.com [209.85.219.217]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 18si147846ewy.12.2009.12.10.16.19.53; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:19:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.219.217 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibc@aliax.net) client-ip=209.85.219.217; Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so517145ewy.31 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:19:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.24.3 with SMTP id t3mr26537ebb.40.1260490793542; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:19:53 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from ibc-laptop.localnet ([212.230.46.89]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm831411ewy.10.2009.12.10.16.19.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:19:52 -0800 (PST) From: =?utf-8?q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: PATH_INFO spec (with regard to ";") Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:19:49 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.28-16-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <20091210223037.GB22867@dcvr.yhbt.net> <6C9FF58B-36A8-429F-85E1-3C34CF984DF9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6C9FF58B-36A8-429F-85E1-3C34CF984DF9@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200912110119.49974.ibc@aliax.net> X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.219.217 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ibc@aliax.net) smtp.mail=ibc@aliax.net X-Original-Sender: ibc@aliax.net Reply-To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list rack-devel@googlegroups.com; contact rack-devel+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/t/5984cfeef920f24d X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/msg/a7f80bd85d9d01c9 Sender: rack-devel@googlegroups.com List-Unsubscribe: , List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El Viernes, 11 de Diciembre de 2009, James Tucker escribi=C3=B3: > > Of course, in the grand scheme of things, hardly anybody uses ";" in > > paths. Yay for rare corner cases making our lives difficult. >=20 > Amen, because I feel like I want to say "be configurable", given all of t= he > above. I'm coding a XCAP server using Rack. XCAP is basically XPath over HTTP in=20 which there are HTTP URI's like the following: /auid/global/mydoc.xml/~~/ruleset/rule%5b@id=3D%22sip:dom.org;p=3Dabc%22%5d After reading RFC for URI and HTTP I think that the ";" is valid into the=20 above URI. I also asked in a XCAP maillist and received same conclusion. Please tell me if you consider the ";" in the above URI wrong. Regards. =2D-=20 I=C3=B1aki Baz Castillo