From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivered-To: chneukirchen@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.141.15 with SMTP id o15cs418484rvd; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:52:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mr.google.com ([10.142.248.21]) by 10.142.248.21 with SMTP id v21mr412631wfh.38.1263837141821 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:52:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.248.21 with SMTP id v21mr72066wfh.38.1263837139986; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:52:19 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.142.7.26 with SMTP id 26ls1029180wfg.1.p; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:52:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.247.20 with SMTP id u20mr1042486wfh.26.1263837137640; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:52:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.247.20 with SMTP id u20mr1042485wfh.26.1263837137296; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:52:17 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mail-pz0-f180.google.com (mail-pz0-f180.google.com [209.85.222.180]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 25si1319042pzk.15.2010.01.18.09.52.16; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:52:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of joshpeek@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.222.180; Received: by mail-pz0-f180.google.com with SMTP id 10so2301268pzk.19 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:52:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.115.29.12 with SMTP id g12mr4370267waj.43.1263837136125; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:52:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Joshua Peek Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:51:56 -0600 Message-ID: <1c5622661001180951gd3fea06v2e169b27b184a766@mail.gmail.com> Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Friends_of_Rack_=E2=88=A9_Friends_of_JRuby_=28was_Re=3A_Ra?= =?UTF-8?Q?ck_test_spec=5Frack=5Fruntime_fails_on_JRuby_due_to_timing=29?= To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of joshpeek@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=joshpeek@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: josh@joshpeek.com Reply-To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list rack-devel@googlegroups.com; contact rack-devel+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/t/200889b8e641f0f4 X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/msg/e4e3052200d49180 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +1 for any Rack CI. We have nothing right now. On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: > If we get this green, I may advocate we set up a CI build for > JRuby+Rack somewhere. We've got a server (ci.jruby.org) where we could > put it, and it's obviously a pretty critical piece of infrastructure. > > As for JRuby actives on the Rack lists...I'm not sure... > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Ryan Tomayko wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter >> wrote: >>> This came up because a friend of JRuby is working to prepare a Gentoo >>> ebuild, and wants to get all related packages running green. >> >> Speaking of, are there any friends of JRuby that are active on the >> rack list? It'd be cool if someone could sign up for ensuring the test >> suite is green before shipping new releases. >> >> Thanks, >> Ryan >> > -- Joshua Peek