From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Delivered-To: chneukirchen@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.72.79 with SMTP id l15cs955015bkj; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:28:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of grbounce-ceibQwUAAAB4YPBqaDIjI2bFOCxyyh3G=chneukirchen=gmail.com@googlegroups.com designates 10.220.4.30 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.220.4.30; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of grbounce-ceibQwUAAAB4YPBqaDIjI2bFOCxyyh3G=chneukirchen=gmail.com@googlegroups.com designates 10.220.4.30 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=grbounce-ceibQwUAAAB4YPBqaDIjI2bFOCxyyh3G=chneukirchen=gmail.com@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=grbounce-ceibQwUAAAB4YPBqaDIjI2bFOCxyyh3G=chneukirchen=gmail.com@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.220.4.30]) by 10.220.4.30 with SMTP id 30mr4866784vcp.17.1250530091116 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:28:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to :mime-version:received:date:in-reply-to:x-ip:references:user-agent :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:reply-to:sender:precedence:x-google-loop :mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-unsubscribe :x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; bh=fUx27I6J6M4LLrhI012g7H4D3sjE/nrW/ZO92pMr1HU=; b=T0p7c6zdtxgCwVRImGebgANOqhOmpfotTkIkEzrdOy+YB2PR0Lw/Gj1w1nJqzk+A6h qAc2gCFWTuuCcO/AONF/kW1czuHh5r8Rhkjl2n5I6kfaZaIpBwjB0q4q9AqVvgd6j44n L2gNBPZtLoPJKfDg1MhQYlPM+DbOB5t8J8b4Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-sender:x-apparently-to:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:x-ip :references:user-agent:x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:reply-to:sender:precedence :x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-unsubscribe:x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; b=zuKpvF84Ldu84jpf4wVugw6vIPChD7va6HO+EfpvmbUpH/1bqY8SbxJX3tnE8IxKq6 zPuIfodrczOtUQjbQ3RbjLPKquyGlXNridmqNgawSWuTBE4Ij59k7bqvy4gS2s/IAMg/ AfBTrYxJkFbUDvZ58OVgCup3ZFThpNWdSNHnw= Received: by 10.220.4.30 with SMTP id 30mr808096vcp.17.1250530091028; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.177.102.22 with SMTP id e22gr1596yqm.0; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:27:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Sender: hongli@phusion.nl X-Apparently-To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.16.34 with SMTP id 34mr1223950anp.3.1250530075585; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:27:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:27:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <94690572-f32a-44e1-b348-769966b56ddb@i4g2000prm.googlegroups.com> X-IP: 77.249.52.222 References: <20090718222513.GA31002@dcvr.yhbt.net> <5062a5fb-7385-4e8f-aeb9-6b61c9e305d0@n11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <06b05b4f-99be-4479-91fe-e24741dc6457@z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <94690572-f32a-44e1-b348-769966b56ddb@i4g2000prm.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.2) Gecko/20090729 Firefox/3.5.2,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Message-ID: <037db915-0fec-45be-aad2-a4158e9d49f3@d32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Tempfile#unlink changes in Ruby 1.9.1-p152 From: Hongli Lai To: Rack Development Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Sender: rack-devel@googlegroups.com Precedence: bulk X-Google-Loop: groups Mailing-List: list rack-devel@googlegroups.com; contact rack-devel+owner@googlegroups.com List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: , X-BeenThere-Env: rack-devel@googlegroups.com X-BeenThere: rack-devel@googlegroups.com On Aug 12, 7:13=A0am, Taylor luk wrote: > Hi guys, > > I think this is not getting enough attention as it deserves, The issue > isn't about people using svn trunk release of ruby, But Ruby 1.9.1- > p243 which is the latest stable version of ruby people can download > fromhttp://ruby-lang.org > > Passenger issue tracker have marked this issue invalid in their bug > tracker,I have tried patch described in the links above and no > success. > > Tempfile class is been patched in Rack. Perphas the upcoming 1.0.1 > release, Anyone who can provide some status update or point me to the > right direction ? Well I want to have this issue solved, it's just that right now I'm buried under tons of client work so I haven't had the time yet.