From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS54825 145.40.68.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E0CC1F406 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=CGp0UvHe; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C03B8172F for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 709C6C433CB for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:30:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1702423802; bh=WTD2o0zcbXVF2fFDXS838V53B9qAqtLeuLU/99pFs8w=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=CGp0UvHecsrlSIU3jnYBYe77/5Qva/ULhrVc3BitWwxfCw0vJVPHr3gXScV95ke2W +BrgW3RO4pRKtlZH0aVQ2PnffLGdihLNShsFeXQbfXxAlocfzH9SAQYAt5K8p5ozrv mb9RMzVM9Pt3KtrKEM7/0j6w3yToPOVk3qxb8Tk4490hM6NAYodPafRJ5TWVROnEGg pbeJlf3KbpLhaLmLQSmI/iD7sZXbcXTDi3A4dF8h4k5YEU2onJL4QEI/rlVoJKOgCU du7ESgBDsPZK60Gl7y3aTE7EyJRfmgQUDvzLcOCkuOAlxkuIA0DEpAwb0MCtr4Sggi 1fhij4WfhULIg== Received: by mail-lf1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50c0478f970so6595876e87.3 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:30:02 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxGgo8bE5n4v+3qGplh0DDO1mn0f7+HxttEqisSuKh/PxK9rcLN LOvxeqEkI9pPBrADwtnsYmrH7C+xWamRWvpBPw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFiYJ4gPT80dz3/3CR9QqN+nKtXgDPagWY1TcSNyMUiWE16h0gG48KaboLw1Ft39QJEf+kvNrn1heUNEIY3gVU= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4351:0:b0:50e:f9a:9df8 with SMTP id o17-20020ac24351000000b0050e0f9a9df8mr89641lfl.41.1702423800604; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:30:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20231128001028.M189230@dcvr> <20231128-classy-brown-muskrat-7f07b1@nitro> <20231128173509.M955004@dcvr> <20231128-pretty-sidewinder-of-pluck-a61b0a@meerkat> In-Reply-To: <20231128-pretty-sidewinder-of-pluck-a61b0a@meerkat> From: Rob Herring Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 17:29:48 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: extra search flags and params? (ispatch, replycount, ...) To: Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: Eric Wong , meta@public-inbox.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 11:49=E2=80=AFAM Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 05:35:09PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > > I understand the reasoning, but I'm not sure we should be trying too = hard to > > > make public-inbox a patch tracking platform. What makes lei great is = ability > > > to automatically find and retrieve entire threads -- I feel like we s= hould > > > leave series tracking to other platforms that already exist (patchwor= k, > > > patchew, etc). patch tracking platforms might want to use public-inbox to get the patches in the first place. > > > > I was thinking more along the lines of readers just trying to > > find trying to find non-patch discussions. I do this time to time to find things I miss. Since I have patch tracking, I don't miss patches. > Ah. I think here is enough to just say "s:* AND NOT s:PATCH" without > introducing additional xapian indexing parameters. Though, perhaps the we= b > interface can also gain a "collapse threads" view? There's also [RFC 1/N], [PATCHv5], or just [vN], so: "s:* AND NOT (s:PATCH OR s:RFC OR s:v1 OR s:v2 OR s:v3...)" But when someone does "[RFC] Things I want to discuss" or "blah blah patch blah blah" it won't work. It's fragile and inexact. We already have find certain patches with dfn:, why not find all patches? Rob