From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from mail-ot1-x32a.google.com (mail-ot1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 273B61F9FD for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 16:00:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id l12-20020a9d6a8c0000b0290238e0f9f0d8so9963349otq.8 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 09:00:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bWOIZX+LBUmA2u/D7ieD0wrXu3VotFzP2HElfvXBkeU=; b=uteKnv5PVv+xlZ75UKW+4BH53y9iHBGYfFJQIxbfrzpeLoorE/1vVfSrQCH9t7s6Bo hPQwMYQJH38z0YGp+TMztXocEUsJojF1ODHpfyUW+A8N8355n+i7vDVL6uV2llUaQjyF sqytDNZCnv6LcVHOPXtskKXwP3vqd33hBy+674DfKEjh4LWT0eANr9lqdiWWuBwXiQHU WjpFff+ri5Pj9eBBx7zbyybe4ULrteBzt0JFx4BdAFs/JQspRLwWy4lOs5eZk+i22JKd i25mgmKJATGtT4GkOtYBK1QgzljrPGuHT0oMcpdBi2zelvVTYzIkhZ3FyoWqlxdWdYQn Zesg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bWOIZX+LBUmA2u/D7ieD0wrXu3VotFzP2HElfvXBkeU=; b=pZ3YlicJ4ontBm1gWx26NSER2lKqC0f0vl/EnnJFBimdaayN3U7fYiMv8Vkhai1QyV fnhooHOerJgzg7movPKCDXjK0nj6AdAqHBWMntMa2xN1McsgertxcXFJZlaf+USmF/iD LKVtAuGJImHkhrbJjlgN2mE+KzK4pI9wQ7P/94YpCgwf70wOuMcfVULVHK40NZDommms tgDIw1sJr7v+DxhElk1upKLO15a4rN1BEPssVncZvCx3wtgOOpO8DsPh9a8wpzmkNRQh KBaSgnnrwRKQqac+njkbednpwqQNeqBLT+YqaUy92rM9ERw3CYNSRVjDHcFeZ9/D5qP0 u2Zw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53163KA4gOD5VQ+O/KKXJnuoYh7TAkcvInQICcg8vnXPQXxjOLlB AJ+Yc4eJfJ+tNsVaQI1e65VJWHJx6HW+XNiYMekKzOxD2z062M4Q X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwtRM1Yli5ORsQgds2GFBMjsSBwGh2yssPOCSxSY1KhFwN61Hu8CDIzdGgl9gw1vq16/c1ZVvvs1Wg/lAX2gsc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:13d9:: with SMTP id e25mr19314794otq.94.1616947250477; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 09:00:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210326213517.GA5730@dcvr> <20210327083946.30726-1-133706+stdedos@users.noreply.github.com> <20210327095431.GA32057@dcvr> <20210327193232.GA11329@dcvr> In-Reply-To: <20210327193232.GA11329@dcvr> From: =?UTF-8?B?zqPPhM6xz43Pgc6/z4Igzp3PhM6tzr3PhM6/z4I=?= Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:00:14 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] git-send-email-reply: Append subject To: meta@public-inbox.org Cc: Eric Wong Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 at 21:32, Eric Wong wrote: > It does, it clutters up the directory listing ("homepage"). > Also redirect adds latency + traffic. > > If somebody is already looking at public-inbox.org, then "meta/" > is already the top link in the listing. Hmm .... I "skipped" it as some error (why on earth "meta" is first on a "name-ascending" sorting?!?!). > > Yeah, me too :-D > > Having a more clean deploy&isolation&remove process would facilitate > > in me testing more > > and providing a cleaner patchset to you. > > Fwiw, the test suite runs w/o install. I wanted to test my change "in reality" (i.e. its browser rendering), rather than run a testing suite. Honestly, I blacked out after being unable to see my result, I didn't think to run tests. (especially considering the not-so-big changes done). > Agree. Note public-inbox.git has a new "symlink-install" target > that allows a minimimum install footprint: > [Also], it's in Debian sid, now: https://packages.debian.org/public-inbox True, but I'd be missing "a backend of existing threads". But now that I think of it, I could've just cloned any small enough repo (e.g. meta? :-p)