From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.migadu.com (out1.migadu.com [91.121.223.63]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D7E21F9FD for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 03:35:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kyleam.com; s=key1; t=1616988943; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=M7/NhBqs3wormDRCbI7QVie6u41D31UcytX09I0jZvs=; b=EnzYHr6Ch/azlVHImLcZ2dbFBekP7gEfaoJbtGkdS1oB99iBZnnKV6QYTr81HT4BaLzh5M zDNa3MKzWwxj09WYhS9MoP4+FyUBhFq6mD1KhUjjN2g05GwSvfR4tJE18W/LuWAGm8TWgd b5rfNns+I926ySWLKrueoSipQICVS+hpZjps/VvAByxNHD4GexS3k3t3mS1AV19l3FRoZl JGRQTJa7WEodGlRkaRGRcWw15dBhhzGbMQpZny+wcWtOa8PQC1zkrQLLIzAYcpGpQpzPNc BBk0fN7sYsP38wNsxtXtVAhvwFdK3Ydg/My9NidVQl4lEbgLytwHL3FP7P27TA== From: Kyle Meyer To: Eric Wong Cc: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] doc lei: add manpages for new commands In-Reply-To: References: <20210329031117.28516-1-kyle@kyleam.com> <20210329031117.28516-7-kyle@kyleam.com> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 23:35:41 -0400 Message-ID: <87pmzi7hte.fsf@kyleam.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: kyle@kyleam.com List-Id: Eric Wong writes: > Kyle Meyer wrote: >> +=for comment > >> +TODO: The below options are shared with lei-q. Any good approaches to >> +not repeating the text? > > I don't know about natively in POD. Perhaps just a list of > switches and a pointer to lei-q(1)? Yeah, this sounds like the way to go to me. I'll make a note to do it for the next round. Thanks.