From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.migadu.com (out1.migadu.com [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:863f::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FA2B1F934 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 00:02:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kyleam.com; s=key1; t=1612310565; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0Z/PBC8Mc1gejb34kKoN4boIFn1vu+0kYVGZdhLgGPU=; b=K0u6VYwc3Q6/UQBv9T32/YSopxbcfKzLtKkZpnyfjelNzyZtn/UD2RoG0uh+MnW3UrKN5x IjzM5eIHKglQObyaCBI5QXGQmh5E27DQFNzGoPd79P+mP0gHsZ311Mf16fTd+OY/tWw0k5 GLrxEqxgijCpfdbZ+lK/7CoyV7h+2rL8tiakbuVN1xs9Tm3tBVLFviaNrfRqBfMTrJcoa4 g8lF/I+Z238kuzy52t6de8q+5duGuiReZLKK0n4agIj7wsnDDznfoGl7oGYfECl8ZeAfk0 Zqez6PYjZnwrAb9ePtYdPr3uKoSl2pDyecW+zet832yQnQNYGamLchY6BbA9ng== From: Kyle Meyer To: Eric Wong Cc: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: can lei require Inline::C? In-Reply-To: <20210202100902.GA1438@dcvr> References: <20210202100902.GA1438@dcvr> Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 19:02:43 -0500 Message-ID: <87ft2exbks.fsf@kyleam.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: kyle@kyleam.com List-Id: Eric Wong writes: > Performance and interactivity suck without being able to use FD > passing (especially tab completions). And having to maintain > and separate code paths is a huge time sink... > > Inline::C is packaged by every relevant distro (unlike > Socket::Msghdr), and I figure anybody who uses lei at this stage > will have a C compiler... Yeah, I'd figure the same, so my uninformed guess/opinion is that the separate code paths aren't worth the trouble.