From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <321942@gmail.com> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from mail-lf1-x141.google.com (mail-lf1-x141.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA57B202AA for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 01:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-x141.google.com with SMTP id q12so3101984lfm.0 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:19:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:accept :accept-language:mail-copies-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=BVfDeX6SCnMC6dtr0V+9BvU1DLkf6oN+eJa0u3BrW30=; b=akhAxnUX/wA2nI6e/Ey7DzqqA+FZt4/laXSaSuaHxljVboxmRpFlMuVUg7H3zmokhG Mnq3B840NpTfXuxHNl7vgd/4tuPuDPb6jGaz1T1HFR7AZ2pEwaUk5E7MbwdF/peIsNBe MMj9ZbBVfX9cAPd+iQMovSNaD6DfbCaxWnYjSZFD6cPmo5c5YSumdIWiK/o3RYe8fHLN mrq/cJrILDQZbl3dGtTmGxKgs6fO50E7a6yJ8sxWePNKZCuW0Gi+HDExaTEOpvNxwxRh evZZopEyoj6HLVFektFNvAYoxCT1RO3Hn3+37RlJ1TeTKrTptTS4Ae+EktxMWkXcfzgl SF+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:accept:accept-language:mail-copies-to:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=BVfDeX6SCnMC6dtr0V+9BvU1DLkf6oN+eJa0u3BrW30=; b=M9+pVpANvKQfVoO73fKx8GoS09DYHkdXp4nXtYwzM6mKvuZlSU1O82N4rkuW40k6nf rrfEgRzWEUyMs3vmj7Dk+lMszaExbONHMZEg9cRnzex2sJDVcbE+V1k4zT3VxfAXmg4K g2Zrsccs0Zy6v7jAZOBY5o+xTEQerr7JtdLRIJvm768wCQ8hnJT+R/gy7M4onc2gW5XI TlFJrpxzo96J33fljdzgp2CBcBY41NmdqkyvqBWARc1TDn6Ngzj0I31VWm9xj/N+hLNE ajAI9jE6qPBecKtABCpjJl/8Vqwejvz46BssIMjiTteBuJ6zREBF9jph6VxdS//Stsmm 3eKA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuYhYANTxAE+QMDW8JuYwtZZPRgvoXuIVd+F77MkEpW7blnDV9vf temnUUbhv8jFKyX/vgfaWjss/i/9 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYB9pWTtp0th4k/n5dVpqhPcOjvxKq3J3JQl6nOT4cU2DonUY6K7Zbv2/YLDgDziLd2DYABAg== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4474:: with SMTP id y20mr3974670lfl.40.1550884785344; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:19:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([213.87.129.195]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p21sm978010lfd.4.2019.02.22.17.19.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:19:44 -0800 (PST) From: Dmitry Alexandrov <321942@gmail.com> To: Mateusz Loskot Cc: Eric Wong , meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: Default theme In-Reply-To: (Mateusz Loskot's message of "Fri, 22 Feb 2019 21:53:52 +0100") References: <20190222085014.mwvkf2mwrb6yeyrh@dcvr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Accept: text/plain,text/markdown,text/x-org,text/html,text/*,*/* Accept-Language: ru,en Mail-Copies-To: always Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 04:19:36 +0300 Message-ID: <87a7in47yv.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mateusz Loskot wrote: > On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 09:50, Eric Wong wrote: >> The way I see it is: whatever color scheme I choose will make >> some people unhappy. That's why I make sure it's customizable >> via user CSS and the CSS class names remain stable. > > I agree. Then, why not keep the no theme. I guess, that was a matter of implementing semantic colour highlighting of = diffs and code. Alas, CSS is not Emacs themes and it doesn=E2=80=99t suppo= rt calculating colours relatively, so you have to either (user-friendly way= ) make some reasonable assumptions about basic colours or (foolproof way) e= nforce them. On the other hand, items of personal taste, such as undecorat= ed links, I believe, got into the published stylesheet simply by mistake. >> "prefers-color-scheme" media queries may be used to set >> to respect user preferences in future browsers. FWIW, Mozilla implemented it a week ago. Also, there has always been a standard, yet pretty weird, and hence not wid= ely used, way to choose a stylesheet for a given page among several alterna= tives: + =E2=80=98D= efault-Style=E2=80=99 HTTP header. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE1yoTx9fONarixgNIydoJ3hnBsjAFAlxwn6kACgkQydoJ3hnB sjC8TwgAqesiIcVf3Dps3jw8vfemAhPw38t/JoRMObUoM/keFQehUqroE6ZswfLC 2A0KbDI2Sr6cAdVL/mtOTmU4mlYM//m4EH+pLbD3DywZJS/X+ofgNd68kmOLxVQ7 inUoUfduBHqDtWSxzii5WZzvSBZjmU+tZ1te7858QDmkdt4S5AaENN51NEOJptYv IBsHGZdf8s9Il3K5Njg3BOje+D+nb0R31L7OJlK8n1gMUqqpRE+EMgYGG8o0k1yv O6F97Y6YpSJFZKeaNnoBmQi/iRwcAYvpmjPs03Wkwc/iGpOnDk1OsTKPX8ynB6DO kS1H32czp/aTCQ4lTBebpK5Z6h/q1g== =WV+T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--