From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS11403 66.111.4.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65F8D1F4BE for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:59:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6989A2217D; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 07:59:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 09 Oct 2019 07:59:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alyssa.is; h= from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm1; bh=S5A9C54uZmN+Gn7qGERGtyBwvy am4SGHEw9db4OwA00=; b=SETJdXacLyamO0J0IQ0oSumGIhA8EIggEpQIiEvvKX LdVN7su+iG/GCvCdLJKSXo88mudS2KM0ZRB0ornkq1BNGgqwwfSdoq647HsBjdN+ Zb2wmjWXruauoPVdVr4c6kxxm/pYe/1TP3ndy4cmzqJehd/zUuOfyqIQxJXqiVXH FxyEMgQRLr5BQ9X/hjK0o7RyYJtZqSl817cN4wLolPh+rLfUbkM/vzN1e2fiZd3n ppaiwWIw2t8f0tINGNToOVOv07Cy/CtTqdPqtIgu5F+ETst9TG4Zz+NtIf+oe2Dw mIndMIck2opSJaw3LTPUujwuNml1GFZHSawGjrjy51tA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=S5A9C5 4uZmN+Gn7qGERGtyBwvyam4SGHEw9db4OwA00=; b=X9+hUg3Ye4qErScVe0B50+ ruMuCgJbE1aStpxqmKyWEv2fvCGdXyv9SlxOfm1xVi/hsg7sHb9oeB95JaDCS0vl 7wbuRlPB5qpnqHq2kvoBZ8iM0ybdU0ORnJQjOA+94HBo6fvfulKO/UTCvnATPBbB RB2c4tc6oOJlzh2oa7W3VRrGDB26UIbKMnQ2LhC6gAPe5kga2SQvubIkxyKlB/n0 zNRr6ybqrT7acnlR+rBWIcPIU0y0PstoLwls1BLzVAVk11Q42CTJn1rCEeZROrTL OheMDEv7BUmryVjdkZHUr5etgapgeQrc7afRKQvJAYrPrIzhl77ju2XCEQRgGx9A == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedriedugddvvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufgjfhffkfggtgesghdtreertd dttdenucfhrhhomheptehlhihsshgrucftohhsshcuoehhihesrghlhihsshgrrdhisheq necukfhppeekuddrudekjedrvddvgedrudeftdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomh ephhhisegrlhihshhsrgdrihhsnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (130.224.187.81.in-addr.arpa [81.187.224.130]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 60B568005A; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 07:59:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Alyssa Ross To: Eric Wong Cc: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: Do I need multiple publicinbox..address values? In-Reply-To: <20191008001050.rwd7bh7cek7qrydi@dcvr> References: <87imp05hlm.fsf@alyssa.is> <20191008001050.rwd7bh7cek7qrydi@dcvr> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 11:59:28 +0000 Message-ID: <877e5eceov.fsf@alyssa.is> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain > Sorry for that confusion. Historically, I wrote public-inbox > and -mda because I needed to migrate mailing lists with a > several month window where the old list would be active, > but I was preparing for the switch: > > So it started as: > > posters -> to_be_shutdown_host -> MTA (postfix) -> public-inbox-mda > > And ends up being: > > posters -> MTA (postfix) -> public-inbox-mda --[1]--> (mlmmj|mailman) > > > It sounds like what you're doing is: > > MTA -> (mlmmj|mailman) -> public-inbox-mda > > Which wasn't my original intended usecase for -mda, but is for -watch. Interesting! The reason I set it up this way is that mailman (at least v3) doesn't archive raw incoming mail -- the default archiver, Hyperkitty, pulls out the body and some headers it cares about, saves them into a database, and discards the rest. Which IMO is not great for an archiver (although I do like Hyperkitty as a web interface for people who haven't yet seen the light of mail). So my plan is to use public-inbox as my primary archiver, and just use Hyperkitty as a "modern" web interface. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEH9wgcxqlHM/ARR3h+dvtSFmyccAFAl2dy6EACgkQ+dvtSFmy ccDVVA/+Ik4/gcdbcfozDPOlZO8/WbtPSVkyD52+1LmVGNQu98Iof7uKRXAAhc0m wr/GOxe7CkghYfWPaSlTr2vUdIRRWNzrhMIsIGZwACjDAbg3IA+XvXhFr0N/v1I8 ZkPLqiZAzSPrLWMjLRXMt2rzDxKyc3OVKl/f0HOGz/eZr18idlN62uxfJI5PA66p zlpj7jTiobC+0GmQS4AhhF9SC4f7EBNY8YvvPz4z2FCvFHNxjZBj6vMtGxibzPmB 2gr3TpFOQJuhoDEVbYX3beYUBfcb5F210x/AHVu2P7wHG5gTKNVvlrDSaRGvoNAc txtUbHwF6VLDNtSxxv4+j+uvg3vVYtPUEsspytV4iuGTAprYpfZlCIqY5On00L7t dtZZhKQTo5VLkAM3RfIR91BRVSiPn7dolmc3OHY+EhDDtcY3XzXnteMDMvK600Uq USIqW3NvSYMHjXrtq1OaHaot8+KTET4C1Cb/jZl03GNC6bYV91azsk2tsDdpnTcy Q7aIvWlQ3OZdLwG361lBMst31HYmzOSp3uRG6QIgO/1VFTSanGQdAQzRU4P1FGXY 2P0krcpRP90trf77JzSO+pkDjT5S7GCeu5e89A3o7cvFcQuKwhJ8GKhlpo7QTqW/ WcheTMSuc0A9g0qtVFL2ZptrfPQGtRb9revp9WPNyfT+MNiGUHU= =o8sq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--