From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.migadu.com (out1.migadu.com [91.121.223.63]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95D341F8C5 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 19:57:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kyleam.com; s=key1; t=1612641432; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=G3MuSBTyjNHjdEGMUfl1YYowFjH4k4PacfaFkef044k=; b=jCKQoSxVMPCO+G/HZTC5FTIMJHu+JFx+DOuQK3Iv/t/7NdMK3siJ2zPFIwAyw9jVljwNBK vdvpx18ijbNgPhHoEUatrFrWft4EOuQI7GpgaNTJF52nEHUyMSGjnZ1biT2EsOUt/KcS8V rCx4jZ+3A94cW8JTCT05YDOwqekkI2cbH7k9DzGwmUSsiAQXOCHzPlISTB0pPNQa0Lx49p M49nrb8k7JiDjrc3T05Rq0UKADJKWdaf4VNL7n04LgD1/oJHyNfNurxAFnGh1DlFbBiyOU aEpu7+6WiOfJDKPIYb+QQiLxqfvUXMs8f67EGfngJuwLjJyGlwBIC3VNPOcOvA== From: Kyle Meyer To: Eric Wong Cc: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: lei-q doc thoughts... [was: doc: start manpages for lei commands] In-Reply-To: <20210206090119.GA14519@dcvr> References: <20210201055704.26683-1-kyle@kyleam.com> <20210201055704.26683-2-kyle@kyleam.com> <20210206090119.GA14519@dcvr> Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 14:57:10 -0500 Message-ID: <874kipj7ft.fsf@kyleam.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: kyle@kyleam.com List-Id: Eric Wong writes: > Kyle Meyer wrote: >> +=item --mua-cmd=COMMAND, --mua=COMMAND > > On second thought: is the long "--mua-cmd" even worth having or > supporting given "--mua=" exists? I will likely remove it from > the documentation and filter it out from the help text. > > Technically "mua-cmd" is more descriptive since it's a command > with a %f placeholder, but I can't imagine anybody wanting to > type "--mua-cmd" over "--mua". No, I can't either. Dropping --mua-cmd makes sense. >> +=item -t, --thread >> + >> +Return all messages in the same thread as the actual match(es). > > Heh, it turns out mairix uses "--threads" (plural). I never > knew that since I always used "-t". Not sure if it's worth > pluralizing on our end... I'd vote for following mairix here. I guess most people will use -t, but it's just one less thing to get tripped up on. By the way, if you'd like, I'd be happy to do a round (or more) of lei manpage updates for new additions whenever you think things are in a good spot for it.