From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com (mail-qk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C45031FAE2 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 20:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id i141so18430801qke.0 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:54:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y7hBY/nnyq+eOnz65aPT9yf7thvdo2W0IdMzyEWUAUc=; b=LJoD47qCE0cDwFg0iMSw/E6PBdpEUNyIamkUG0UvSwTsXQvEXgP4atAs5ZJo4aQSJr xochmdXtB9KSy+RECi61MRFM9lkLG60+jXf8GG1/s6Ck2vZjbXBecY/hRuEQ/fdBhFt/ pQU8yS1TI1ZND5Zx2UTfbI47Ol/F2qxcqK2H8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=y7hBY/nnyq+eOnz65aPT9yf7thvdo2W0IdMzyEWUAUc=; b=mF0AVqF6zfsmuJ5SBxkC9Gx6n9U0eWzAuceCDg8S+jfHzc2fzO3LCFFenCgNtm0laW F4o9LcQ4g6qj9FxE8zXCaQBSeu3vbx4HQ/k2aUuXmHCLFRDy2CtoPlPiaJEgD7bY3Ner DAWRr9gkRqAOJVBMma/0pVpPHzzivIvMq2U+c9w9ozFBQxPpSVb+zsXypVnkKlLHvhIS ZKYn+2oH0X0zovHH3F0o1Un+HMaziJZZ2dEK9eTs3KpCW/loLaWV3CQW45f3ail3YPg0 XpNWCHpFfEWhVmni/pa9E5ur2zUjvxEH17ZZKUXw3AEULz510lZAjVAGWHQpHpn6xqiO pxkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfl3hWJQY3WtEzsxlB9NU4W/8IxXdNpiUYOy3cj5fgavMyOO0EY 321mfSa1BdnMk0NGwhypmR9eiMKQpFA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovg+5KhfE0KKimx9Tnqn+3fTUaVuh4gZ9mt2lr1LqikoPeOlVr1uJzCIGMGfknAni15j7h1XA== X-Received: by 10.55.100.141 with SMTP id y135mr7372470qkb.3.1516049653622; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:54:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.137.2.14] (modemcable221.121-21-96.mc.videotron.ca. [96.21.121.221]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l188sm334024qkd.36.2018.01.15.12.54.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:54:12 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Has anyone tried importing lkml? To: Bram Adams Cc: Eric Wong , meta@public-inbox.org References: <20180115175534.GA5787@80x24.org> <20180115182731.GA9768@80x24.org> <288115d8-7e23-7e7e-8051-a2436ddb40eb@linuxfoundation.org> From: Konstantin Ryabitsev Organization: The Linux Foundation Message-ID: <443422ec-49a6-d703-0e12-42ef79ef8081@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 15:54:10 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: On 2018-01-15 03:42 PM, Bram Adams wrote: > Hi Konstantin, > >> Bram, we're looking at various available options for hosting publicly >> accessible archives of LKML, together with a searchable/threadable web >> frontend. I know this is directly related to the work you've been doing >> with cregit, and I wonder if you would be able to provide Eric with full >> LKML archives for some initial testing. It's probably something cregit >> can benefit from, too, should we start providing this service. > > Yes, we have a copy of the full history until August 2016 of LKML and 130 other mailing lists in mbox form. They are on the cregit server you provided us. Found them. Is October 2000 the beginning of LKML, or just the beginning of the archive? I'm actually unsure of the history of the list. :) > From cregit’s point of view, we are interested in any form of email archive that: > * is up-to-date > * parses the emails into metadata, patches, patch series, … > * is quick to query Looks like we're getting unblocked for these resources, so we may be able to set up that LKML-specific patchwork instance for you -- but that's a separate thread that should probably stay off this list. Best, -- Konstantin Ryabitsev Director, IT Infrastructure Security The Linux Foundation