From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1601E1F406; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 21:52:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=80x24.org; s=selector1; t=1692913948; bh=sNlXo8vZGBersQ+asYGzGzhCNk1s0Jye44BIAGuUVmM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Y3lTfRO3IHuHY7+wA74sn5wNbZXirWoJxlE3j50y6nadhMigRBgIouUDApc2ZcDI1 6AdJAX9EPd9CQFhZLE1u2rdsMW0oJbutwS7LAv/DzG49kOHjR2AR86f8UvQTydj+8c lsUX/p4bp7ntz2jw4vW0B/hHHgoIFQGfI0TEFWkA= Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 21:51:03 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Cc: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: INSTALL: note OpenBSD xapian-bindings-perl package Message-ID: <20230824215103.M812040@dcvr> References: <20230824193509.3709766-1-e@80x24.org> <20230824223025+0200.280217-stepnem@smrk.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20230824223025+0200.280217-stepnem@smrk.net> List-Id: Štěpán Němec wrote: > Tangentially related: I've taken this opportunity to review my (OpenBSD) > install script and found one other package I needed to install that > isn't mentioned in INSTALL, namely, p5-IO-Socket-SSL. Is there a test which fails without it? It should be optional (warnings emitted, functionality degrading gracefully and tests automatically skipped). It's pulled in by Mail-IMAPClient and a bunch of other modules I have installed, so I can't easily test it atm, but I'll put a note for it in INSTALL. On a side note, running OpenBSD i386 via QEMU on amd64 Linux is very slow. Hoping OpenBSD amd64 will be faster... > I didn't report it or give it too much thought at the time, as I was > under the impression that the INSTALL file wasn't quite up-to-date or > definitive, anyway (that impression being corroborated by my previous > experience installing public-inbox on Arch Linux: IIRC there were some > dependency surprises there, too, unfortunately I didn't keep any notes > then), but seeing you touching these parts now I figured I'd mention it. INSTALL ought to be definitive and up-to-date as there's optional and non-Perl dependencies which (AFAIK) can't be specified in Makefile.PL Any help you can offer would be appreciated, since I'm usually in a Debian bubble :)