user/dev discussion of public-inbox itself
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
Cc: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>,
	1002219@bugs.debian.org, meta@public-inbox.org,
	Debian Perl Group <pkg-perl-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Subject: [PATCH] t/eml.t: ignore newer Email::MIME behavior
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 19:17:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211230191742.M703794@dcvr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8509eb16-40e8-6aa4-a032-668f2c636228@kleine-koenig.org>

Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> adding the Debian Perl Group to Cc, maybe they can help here.
> (for context look at https://bugs.debian.org/1002219)
> 
> On 12/30/21 10:12, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > I got a bug report against the public-inbox 1.6.1 package about a
> > failing test, see below for the whole output. I didn't have time yet to
> > look into it, so this is just a heads up to make you aware. If someone
> > has a hint what to do, this would be greatly appreciated. Maybe just
> > updating to 1.7 will help?
> > 
> > Best regards
> > Uwe
> > 
> > On 12/21/21 17:34, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > #   Failed test 'filename decoded'
> > > > #   at t/eml.t line 407.
> > > > #          got: '=?utf-8?q?vtpm-makefile.patch?='
> > > > #     expected: 'vtpm-makefile.patch'
> > > > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 146.
> > > > t/eml.t ......................
> 
> I can reproduce this problem with 1.6.1 checked out. I played a bit around
> (suffering from my weak perl foo) and found that when I downgrade
> libemail-mime-perl from 1.952-1 (i.e. Debian unstable's version) to 1.949-1
> (i.e. Debian stable's version), this works.
> 
> The reproducer is:
> 
> $ perl -e 'use Email::MIME; print Email::MIME->new("Content-Type:
> text/x-patch; name=\"=?utf-8?q?vtpm-fakefile.patch?=\"\nContent-Disposition:
> attachment; filename=\"=?utf-8?q?vtpm-makefile.patch?=\"\n\n")->filename;'
> 
> which emits "vtpm-makefile.patch" with 1.949-1 (as public-inbox expects),
> but =?utf-8?q?vtpm-makefile.patch?= with 1.952-1.
> 
> So the key question is: Is the test correct and his is a regression in
> libemail-mime-perl, or is the test wrong and we need to fix the test (and
> PublicInbox::Eml)?

I thought I sent a fix to this; but I nuked the root FS on one of
my workstations on accident :<  Still recovering...

--------------8<-------------
Subject: [PATCH] t/eml.t: ignore newer Email::MIME behavior

Once again, our message parser class matches the more tolerant
behavior of older Email::MIME releases in order to handle
ancient messages.

This fixes <https://bugs.debian.org/1002219>, but dropping
Email::MIME entirely from the test suite may be prudent in
the future.
---
 t/eml.t | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/eml.t b/t/eml.t
index 2d8993a5..2e6a441f 100644
--- a/t/eml.t
+++ b/t/eml.t
@@ -417,13 +417,14 @@ Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="=?utf-8?q?vtpm-fakefile.patch?="
 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="=?utf-8?q?vtpm-makefile.patch?="
 
 EOF
-	is($cls->new($s)->filename, 'vtpm-makefile.patch', 'filename decoded');
+	is($cls->new($s)->filename, 'vtpm-makefile.patch',
+		"filename decoded ($cls)") if $cls ne 'PublicInbox::MIME';
 	$s =~ s/^Content-Disposition:.*$//sm;
 	is($cls->new($s)->filename, 'vtpm-fakefile.patch',
 		"filename fallback ($cls)") if $cls ne 'PublicInbox::MIME';
 	is($cls->new($s)->content_type,
 		'text/x-patch; name="vtpm-fakefile.patch"',
-		'matches Email::MIME output, "correct" or not');
+		qq[matches Email::MIME output, "correct" or not ($cls)]);
 
 	$s = <<'EOF';
 Content-Type: multipart/foo; boundary=b

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-30 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <YcICMPpA2SE5k5ZL@xanadu.blop.info>
2021-12-30  9:12 ` Bug#1002219: public-inbox: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 test TEST_VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2 Uwe Kleine-König
2021-12-30 18:49   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-12-30 19:17     ` Eric Wong [this message]
2022-01-02 14:14       ` [PATCH] t/eml.t: ignore newer Email::MIME behavior Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://public-inbox.org/README

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211230191742.M703794@dcvr \
    --to=e@80x24.org \
    --cc=1002219@bugs.debian.org \
    --cc=lucas@debian.org \
    --cc=meta@public-inbox.org \
    --cc=pkg-perl-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org \
    --cc=uwe@kleine-koenig.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/public-inbox.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).