From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190E71F4B4; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 00:25:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 00:25:40 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: upcoming perl v5.12 requirement... Message-ID: <20210414002539.GA2383@dcvr> References: <20210413192920.42920-1-e@80x24.org> <20210413194435.GA3371@dcvr> <20210413211704.4tnjuhnyiev2omp5@nitro.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210413211704.4tnjuhnyiev2omp5@nitro.local> List-Id: Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:44:35PM -0400, Eric Wong wrote: > > On a side note, I'm strongly considering moving to Perl 5.12 > > after public-inbox 1.7 is released. perl 5.12.4 will be a > > decade old in a few months (however 5.12.5 was Nov 2012). > > As long as we can set the low bar at 5.16, I'm good with that. Lore will > eventually roll onto newer platforms than CentOS7, but there's still a lot of > yak left to shave before that happens. :) No problem. The Perl requirement will crawl forward as slowly as enterprise/LTS distros go. I have no plans to skip 5.14, either (haven't started looking at perl514*delta, and won't until we're on 5.12).