From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <e@80x24.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
	shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1])
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD681F9FC;
	Thu, 25 Mar 2021 05:22:29 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 08:22:29 +0300
From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: is "lei mark" a good name?
Message-ID: <20210325052229.GA6447@dcvr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: <meta.public-inbox.org>

It can set/unset volatile metadata for any number of messages.

"Volatile metadata" being "labels" (aka "mailboxes" in
JMAP-speak) and "keywords" (seen|flagged|answered|...),
(aka "flags" in IMAP/Maildir-speak).

	"lei mark +kw:seen"		# makes sense

	"lei mark +L:some-folder-name"	# might sound odd...


AFAIK, notmuch uses "notmuch tag" which combines both labels
and keywords into one thing: "tags".  But I'm also not a
notmuch user...

Would "lei tag" be better?

Anything else?