From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E6A11F934 for ; Fri, 1 Jan 2021 09:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id j22so27567415eja.13 for ; Fri, 01 Jan 2021 01:08:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=pThxXQB864CSUC4NT1fjHdWe+iR0fZNsBW39lUoWGNY=; b=U4csg+e7WrLOin92BAHEGF7VNTyZjM9LcOgX1fZQS1jO7LIhz/Ov1YwhuMQrQps6Gu PO45g9BKL48vtHD0ljLwkmGlYjRG1zPsET1PJ1/VxVheFoWIL8aJwXV6jRK8qLwpfg03 1fxWrFN/GNfg1ojdteR7LBaM9W5bSjSp732O/U1lIwEMhGUYtbcFi68wXaUgvXyfa6A6 BezPQGwTGlxjRyFnV3EAMVAF7K/hiKZJbquqUEZRtS3LHdUFmfrWJLboodqGTQAdSyzO tP9iyxYWJjIL4UUZ1hHY6+iYsaOS+jx239M/OqL1O+mVS9XOsQsULNPSZEixp69cC/kp UXCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=pThxXQB864CSUC4NT1fjHdWe+iR0fZNsBW39lUoWGNY=; b=O2y3zqk0aSKZEE4hheRGtn9XEDKVEaTUssqlGOJ6xW2W6VWaYgTR8Rpv86pvDnuzKS n1LX9qfee37HOqhsQetl8DazC55ARWLVMYHUbREsPcXZfCFaQFL3ryELJiKC0ZTMHmcO d2qZ+9SrJRlAs/J3imV3fsoyObJkATGe1+vJl/9Bn62f7tJBssRQTC7fOu9jvLIeX32T YwrqQgLTw54xROApPEinJgof5WN/mLCViQaEwkMVb6GE662sVSgk71DaSnebf4KOagrc lpuxUQGqzYWnBPIaFe6Af5LkDPe3Cg9OgiEQdpvZWNc8WjLwUC6LgO1UUm1iOb/6Nssi TCug== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5314bbR4nVbkQ/xmM2uiAwSEH5SbC9dyU5k0G86rlhY2GW2IZXZG Est0sEpmUiM+c/hBL8pb9uk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzzPZA+E9Thezk/+0yEpqhFx1M/MByiM5AgUsHvU8JWOwvvIXI0xkvF4j2cauX+oMXCbR4qJw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1cd4:: with SMTP id i20mr57526044ejh.415.1609492096700; Fri, 01 Jan 2021 01:08:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from gmail.com (193-81-74-120.adsl.highway.telekom.at. [193.81.74.120]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id mb15sm20580813ejb.9.2021.01.01.01.08.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 01 Jan 2021 01:08:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2021 10:08:14 +0100 From: Johannes Altmanninger To: Kyle Meyer Cc: Eric Wong , meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: Unexpected white-on-black text in QtWebEngine-based browsers Message-ID: <20210101090814.bhrlevpowwutm4up@gmail.com> References: <20201231220649.psdyhorlwy6f66wh@gmail.com> <871rf5sh0g.fsf@kyleam.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871rf5sh0g.fsf@kyleam.com> List-Id: On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 11:16:54PM +0000, Kyle Meyer wrote: > Hmm I just installed Qutebrowser (1.14.1, which looks to be the latest > release) via Guix and visited public-inbox.org/meta, and it used the > light theme. I've never used Qutebrowser, and I don't have any idea why > I see a different default. Thanks for testing, this is really weird. Let's see what comes up in https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-89753 > > At any rate, I can make it use a dark theme by adding the following line > to $HOME/.config/qutebrowser/config.py: > > config.set("colors.webpage.darkmode.enabled", True) I tried with both dark-mode settings, no difference. Same with "qutebrowser --temp-basedir", which uses the default configuration. Enabling dark mode does not seem to do anything either. Maybe it's because I'm running on Wayland.