From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <e@yhbt.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
	shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1])
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75791F5AE;
	Tue,  7 Jul 2020 07:15:02 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 07:15:01 +0000
From: Eric Wong <e@yhbt.net>
To: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] mda: use PublicInbox::Address to extract emails
Message-ID: <20200707071501.GA69848@dcvr>
References: <20200619171847.7852-1-e@yhbt.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200619171847.7852-1-e@yhbt.net>
List-Id: <meta.public-inbox.org>

Eric Wong <e@yhbt.net> wrote:
> I'm not sure why this wasn't done in Jun/July 2016 when I was
> working on PublicInbox::Address to replace the DoS-vulnerable
> Email::Address.

*shrug* probably just a brain fart back in the day.

> Nowadays, PublicInbox::Address allows using Email::Address::XS
> which should be fast and robust.

Been kinda wondering if Perl 5.10 RE grammars can get the job
done w/o involving XS or having DoS vulnerabilities of non-XS
Email::Address...

Anyways, pushed as commit c0f3095c2f0fdf3409a2d7bc629230cd83a06f9f