From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Cc: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: Re: httpd 502s [was: trying to figure out 100% CPU usage in nntpd...]
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:36:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190911173628.GA14147@pure.paranoia.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190911171250.vqqpaeb7sn34hv3s@dcvr>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 05:12:50PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > To give some more data points, downgrading to f4f0a3be still shows a
> > number of /tmp/PerlIO* (deleted) entries, but the number of pipes stays
> > the same over time. If I switch to the latest master, the number of
> > broken pipes grows steadily following each git pull (in the hundreds
> > after 10 minutes of running).
>
> Thanks for that info, did those deleted entries eventually go
> away (perhaps after several minutes)?
They don't appear to go away -- since 10:23 UTC earlier today, they
accumulated over 2,400 entries:
# ls -al /proc/{2103,2104,2105,2106}/fd | grep deleted | wc -l
2427
# ls -al /proc/{2103,2104,2105,2106}/fd | grep pipe | wc -l
26
Curiously, I also have this datapoint that may or may not be making
things more confusing. :)
# ls -al /proc/{2103,2104,2105,2106}/fd | grep deleted | awk '{print $8}' | sort | uniq -c
695 10:24
356 10:27
843 14:45
175 14:46
6 14:50
372 17:19
4 17:20
11 17:23
So, they appear to show up in chunks and hang around together.
For nginx configs, this is the relevant part:
server {
listen *:80 default_server;
proxy_buffering off;
location ~ ^(.*/(HEAD|info/refs|objects/info/[^/]+|git-(upload|receive)-pack))$ {
proxy_pass http://localhost:8080;
proxy_read_timeout 90;
proxy_connect_timeout 90;
proxy_redirect off;
proxy_set_header Host $host;
proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $http_x_forwarded_proto;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Port $server_port;
}
}
When setting up lore, I also considered serving git via git-http-backend
instead of passing it via public-inbox-httpd -- the only reason we
didn't try that was because it complicated SELinux bits a bit. Can you
think of a reason why we shouldn't server git requests directly via
git-http-backend?
Thanks for your help.
-K
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-11 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-08 10:45 [PATCH] nntp: regexp always consumes rbuf if "\n" exists Eric Wong
2019-09-08 10:52 ` trying to figure out 100% CPU usage in nntpd Eric Wong
2019-09-09 10:05 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-09-09 17:53 ` Eric Wong
2019-09-10 8:38 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-09-10 18:12 ` Eric Wong
2019-09-11 2:22 ` httpd 502s [was: trying to figure out 100% CPU usage in nntpd...] Eric Wong
2019-09-11 10:24 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-09-11 17:12 ` Eric Wong
2019-09-11 17:36 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev [this message]
2019-09-12 0:05 ` Eric Wong
2019-09-12 2:49 ` Eric Wong
2019-09-12 8:35 ` Eric Wong
2019-09-12 11:37 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-09-13 3:12 ` Eric Wong
2019-09-13 7:03 ` Eric Wong
2019-09-13 9:01 ` Eric Wong
2019-09-13 18:07 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-09-14 5:25 ` Eric Wong
2019-09-11 9:44 ` trying to figure out 100% CPU usage in nntpd Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-09-11 17:12 ` Eric Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://public-inbox.org/README
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190911173628.GA14147@pure.paranoia.local \
--to=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=e@80x24.org \
--cc=meta@public-inbox.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/public-inbox.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).