From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <e@80x24.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN:  
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
	shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1])
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15E020248;
	Wed,  3 Apr 2019 21:21:07 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 21:21:07 +0000
From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: Re: handling GDPR requests
Message-ID: <20190403212107.cimdso7menzydkdl@dcvr>
References: <20190401155032.GB3701@chatter.qube.local>
 <20190401175551.naauxlsxpvqyysu5@dcvr>
 <20190403205508.GA16501@pure.paranoia.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190403205508.GA16501@pure.paranoia.local>
List-Id: <meta.public-inbox.org>

Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Quick follow-up -- is it possible to edit the content of the message
> instead of purging it entirely?

Not yet.  Purge + re-add of the edited message works, but NNTP
ordering would be affected (and maybe that would be desirable).

Anyways, it seems like whoever wants the removal is Streisand-ing
themselves in the process :>