From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA66020248; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 01:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 01:49:15 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: ActivityPub <=> email bridge? Message-ID: <20190330014915.o2hw333fjotxkrjy@dcvr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: Is it worth the effort? Something tells me that if ActivityPub reaches high-enough adoption levels; it'll have to deal with a spam problem that email folks have been dealing with for decades, too. So ActivityPub seems like a duplicated effort as far as it's use for messaging for software development goes...