From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: ActivityPub <=> email bridge?
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 01:49:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190330014915.o2hw333fjotxkrjy@dcvr> (raw)
Is it worth the effort?
Something tells me that if ActivityPub reaches high-enough
adoption levels; it'll have to deal with a spam problem that
email folks have been dealing with for decades, too.
So ActivityPub seems like a duplicated effort as far as it's use
for messaging for software development goes...
next reply other threads:[~2019-03-30 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-30 1:49 Eric Wong [this message]
2023-03-07 22:12 ` ActivityPub <=> email bridge? Eric Wong
2023-03-07 22:17 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-03-07 22:25 ` Eric Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://public-inbox.org/README
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190330014915.o2hw333fjotxkrjy@dcvr \
--to=e@80x24.org \
--cc=meta@public-inbox.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/public-inbox.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).