user/dev discussion of public-inbox itself
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: Re: Race condition in public-inbox-nntpd?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 06:36:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181016063620.bm34ts45yp5irqmh@untitled> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181013124658.23b9f9d2@lwn.net>

Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> So for a little while, I've been seeing occasional NNTP weirdness,
> associated with log lines like:
> 
>   Oct 13 18:01:06 archive.lwn.net public-inbox-nntpd[12352]: error from:
>   XOVER 196731-196731 (BUG: nested long response at /usr/local/share/perl5/PublicInbox/NNTP.pm line 588.
> 
> Such complaints tend to be immediately followed by significant
> disgruntlement on the client side.

Do you have any logs of client commands which hit this?

public-inbox-nntpd should log commands + timings to stdout.

> I use gnus to read the various NNTP feeds, and I mark articles (with "u")
> when I want to keep them around; I typically have quite a few of them
> marked at any given time in a group like linux-kernel.  When I open the
> group in gnus, it will do an XOVER on each of those marked articles,
> generating dozens of single-article XOVERs in quick succession.  It's
> always the single-article ones that fail; the big XOVER for all of the new
> stuff at the end works just fine.
> 
> Another user has complained that things fail with Thunderbird, again with
> the same symptoms on the server side.

No idea how to use either gnus or tbird, here; so a command
sequence which can be fed into nc or socat would be helpful in
reproducing the problem.

Any relation to group size in reproducing this?

> I have "fixed" the problem with this little patch:

<snip>

> That makes things work, but it is clearly papering over the real
> problem.

Agreed.

> I've spent a fair while staring at the code.  As far as I can tell, the
> logic there should be sufficient to prevent this from happening; it's not
> supposed to be reading while a long response is in the works.  But somehow
> it happens.

I stared at it some, too; but I'm not seeing it right now, either;
but it's been a tiring few weeks for me so I'm not at my sharpest.

Thanks for bringing this to everyones' attention.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-16  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-13 18:46 Race condition in public-inbox-nntpd? Jonathan Corbet
2018-10-16  6:36 ` Eric Wong [this message]
2018-10-16 14:04   ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-12-06  3:59 ` [PATCH] nntp: prevent event_read from firing twice in a row Eric Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://public-inbox.org/README

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181016063620.bm34ts45yp5irqmh@untitled \
    --to=e@80x24.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=meta@public-inbox.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/public-inbox.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).