From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C46C1F85E for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id t79-v6so14430765qke.4 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:18:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=UAsqS6aCNr2nq0GIT+t0gtnvWe8kVTgRokdAywubnIM=; b=NGK6Z96vvaU/9oWbmXN+LIz3pdlrK6VtfWZyMN6I1zLC0wflUUsxkyuEB1xcrL4lDK /1T/G+hrI6nNkhyEbbhiv8YXy6uzXLdd8L3I9wkSfRIiED2r7MmbP7KEv3kLuDOrZDgd jYwPhyXTulosUrBzcj+7J+ggeia0If9X6/YYc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=UAsqS6aCNr2nq0GIT+t0gtnvWe8kVTgRokdAywubnIM=; b=f36e+VrMTbyU4pYWU+oVsafwrVNG4ih28g5TffZsl/+Art5Y5Z5N3SBM4lYM1yxzlx 7PlKE7VuFFb5yDFFI+Am8Gub0sry+h4KcsDy91KEnKoYKDIlpl7Nv5a/lw6MYhCHiqBl WWioTjyJ6JVjaPnMuLflJ/zr99a5gSpCEkVGGQy7IB+nvov0ENk0HWuHZQa+YcbPosNw 4P//ac+mbOp4tY4Gu6eDqgzF0cMSJbFn6pKhSS8iyQdyNg1Cb6KL9UGS0YXAylQkF0fp F2ZqqFKO1rnQKBkxBLpqCQO/lshmVOXTaCXFWmG0wYNKpShgiBCiVVC3u7W7PJhQbm0K RlFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGjLN9FTjyj3C25YT0mgLUdYkDmVi72nZXUa5RcLYkalyUJufMw Ho2hvdO4rhTzMIcVjQqHW+A+Bw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfZubG6G+3WFqyM4Tj/xZPi+tQxaEUlnKKOjqW828KdRUK1Dcyh2DZBVrujF7X9KcpeRMPgQg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:f86:: with SMTP id 6-v6mr267901qkp.48.1531343909188; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:18:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from puremoods (192-0-230-179.cpe.teksavvy.com. [192.0.230.179]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c93-v6sm22331609qkh.90.2018.07.11.14.18.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:18:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:18:25 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Eric Wong , meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: Q: V2 format Message-ID: <20180711211825.GC25896@puremoods> Mail-Followup-To: "Eric W. Biederman" , Eric Wong , meta@public-inbox.org References: <87k1q1bky6.fsf@xmission.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k1q1bky6.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17) List-Id: On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 03:01:53PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Names. Is there a good reason not to use message numbers as the names > in the git repositories? (Other than the cost to change the code?) That > would remove the need for treat the sqlite msgmap database as precious, > and it would make it easier to recover if an nntp server goes away. In > V2 format the git mailing list git repository is only about 2M larger if > each message has it's msg number as it's name. Plus the git log > is easier to read as messages are all + or -. As in, instead of changes happening to the same file "m", the message is saved into a new file and the old file deleted in each commit? -K