Re: For reviewing a new free license. People who have read and understand the GPL

[Pen-Yuan Hsing <penyuanhsing@gmail.com>]

Dear Julian,

Have you looked at the CERN Open Hardware License 2.0?

https://ohwr.org/project/cernohl/wikis/Documents/CERN-OHL-version-2

It has a strongly-reciprocal variant which is like the GPL but for 
physical objects:

https://ohwr.org/cern_ohl_s_v2.txt

Is there something you're trying to do with this LINDS license that the 
CERN OHL 2.0 does not?

On 3/6/22 10:40, Julian Daich wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am looking for volunteers to review a free license very close to the
> GPL v.3  but with some key differences
> 
> It is intended to be used for licensing physical things and other
> aspects of technology in general in addition to copyright as methods,
> formulations. etc
> 
> The license is copyleft and patent left. Patents are not necessary to
> be used with it, however the license works better combined with
> patents for works not purely covered by copyright.
> 
> Trademarks are handled very differently than the GPL.
> 
> The first work to be released under this license is a therapeutic
> device, however it was designed to be used to release any work that
> can derive in a copyright, patent claim or trademark. The last version
> of the license can be found here
> https://www.lindsinnersole.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/LINDS-General-Public-Agreement-V1.4.rtf
> We( me and other developers involved) are using the term Free Acces
> Technology to refer to works released under this license.
> 
> The purpose of the review is to have feedback and to identify possible
> problems, bugs and improvements. Everyone interested in the task can
> contact me in private. Having previously read and understood the GPL
> is very preferable for the task.
> 
> Best,
> Julian

_______________________________________________
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss