From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1dDZYz-0007Xt-US for mharc-libreplanet-discuss@gnu.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 12:55:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDZYx-0007WD-56 for libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 12:55:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDZYt-0004ri-46 for libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 12:55:07 -0400 Received: from bluehome.net ([96.66.250.149]:48413) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDZYs-0004ra-UK for libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 12:55:03 -0400 Received: by bluehome.net (Postfix, from userid 1037) id 23B67780935; Wed, 24 May 2017 09:55:01 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jason Self" To: libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org Message-Id: <1495644900.11611@jxself.org> In-Reply-To: <4B4D19C5-BC9A-40BC-BE2D-148AB78CCB8B@dyne.org> Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 09:55:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 96.66.250.149 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 Subject: Re: Can we licence our Clojure (Eclipse Public License 1.0) project with the GNU AFFERO GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE? X-BeenThere: libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 16:55:08 -0000 Aspasia Beneti said: > Not sure who you mean I should contact. It was a two-fold suggestion. The first was to participate in the discussion of the next version of the EPL so as to raise GPL compatibility as a thing that should be addressed in that new version. There is a mailing list linked to from [0] for the purposes of discussing the next version of the EPL. The second was to contact the FSF's Licensing & Compliance Lab via licensing@fsf.org for help in seeing if an exception would be appropriate and to see if they could help draft one. Hopefully between these two it'd help solve not just your particular problem but also everyone else's by trying to get a newer version of the EPL that's GPL-compatible. [0] https://mmilinkov.wordpress.com/2013/05/31/community-review-of-the- eclipse-public-license/