From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FEDE1F463 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 19:37:13 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=vXEn4RKbdtuWUJGZCTFy37elv4hTgS0pMiZPnQIwMSJotBfjZc7Bx F+5xXkcAp7WUoPaBbpesLLEpc1p7H/v3XYBwGZHeKubG3xAE/jiKBn39zO68tFyv iYSq0ib4ZNvQogc5SJqyKuztCEQ0TJkMFVjj7ZiKgQ83ti7bEWrwWY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=jnUwbMiXGUIt/Yofcon+mp+uz2Y=; b=A2yU1EqqZQiLq+ZuMuA0i/DS2Isi /CuzZCvuubWFjvJgqiq6w0AlYSDQOFyjAqBBn5H27+9HwIASz2vnknVYM6iSW5jh s5pfAnvCoAr0Rka4S4auJTYbrLKaJgAtR3Ojb8L3HqEThT6ipMMtGWS2W64xEhHW vhn70skekWPlAmw= Received: (qmail 95212 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2019 19:37:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 95200 invoked by uid 89); 10 Dec 2019 19:37:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1576006628; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=xz6cJjJvmN+tC/La5ATZF8e7XVNgNqDWMZFi/CsHQGU=; b=IRDnWvishxDg5bRUhgimgvDxBHUUUY34DRNjAJ0WcShdIRsTXT0c35O9/58FvdCTON2qnO /Qw2d7sKz7G5SXdn2k6+rTckkdjWBs45gLyTP+O+uh9tX74SoTRkG2PQFy2Y7f1KENICpw YFVZmQV+62yre0s8fW9wYRGg6/GVnJo= From: DJ Delorie To: "Carlos O'Donell" Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: test-in-container vs ld.so In-Reply-To: (codonell@redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:37:02 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Carlos O'Donell" writes: >> So, we're already not running ld.so in the container anyway :-P > =20 > Yay! Does that mean we don't have a bug? I think we should still adjust the Makefiles so that what the user sees in the logs more accurately reflects reality.