From: DJ Delorie via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: nsswitch: do not reload if "/" changes
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:20:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xna6t6w1ic.fsf@greed.delorie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o8hmr06v.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (message from Florian Weimer on Mon, 18 Jan 2021 11:47:36 +0100)
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> writes:
> Are you concerned with the case that there are no NSS calls before
> entering the container, so that we don't initialize anything at all?
The key use case for this is tools that manage/debug/investigate the
contents of containers. I would expect with those, they've done many
nss calls in order to authenticate, find the container, etc.
The *common* case for container entry is "enter container, exec some
other program". That exec resets the nss lookup since it's a new
process.
> Hmm. Upon second thought, I think this need to be made fail-closed by
> disabling reload on stat failure. The two things aren't as unrelated as
> one might think (chroot + truning on some security filter doesn't seem
> to be uncommon). Now of course it's a bit unlikely that anything can be
> loaded later if / can't be read, but is there a harm in macking this
> explicity?
Can we reuse the reloadable flag? Or do we need a second independent
flag just for dll reloading? IIRC we also use the reloadable flag for
test cases that override nsswitch.conf, so I would guess no.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-18 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-16 0:59 nsswitch: do not reload if "/" changes DJ Delorie via Libc-alpha
2021-01-16 10:52 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 1:13 ` DJ Delorie via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 10:47 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 18:20 ` DJ Delorie via Libc-alpha [this message]
2021-01-19 16:37 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-01-22 19:10 ` [v2] " DJ Delorie via Libc-alpha
2021-01-26 9:58 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-01-26 16:19 ` DJ Delorie via Libc-alpha
2021-01-26 16:30 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-01-26 16:47 ` DJ Delorie via Libc-alpha
2021-01-27 17:28 ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-01-27 18:44 ` DJ Delorie via Libc-alpha
2021-01-28 0:31 ` Joseph Myers
2021-01-28 0:34 ` DJ Delorie via Libc-alpha
2021-01-28 0:39 ` Joseph Myers
2021-01-28 1:15 ` DJ Delorie via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 12:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2021-01-18 12:53 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 18:27 ` DJ Delorie via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 15:59 ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 16:53 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 14:30 ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 14:40 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 18:35 ` DJ Delorie via Libc-alpha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xna6t6w1ic.fsf@greed.delorie.com \
--to=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=dj@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).