From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [IPv6:2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EB421F852 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A8F385843B for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:22:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7E3C3858D1E for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:22:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org C7E3C3858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=inria.fr Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=inria.fr DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject; bh=LBp4Dl+1o8zaOqFZp8sYTcm4CLjQPyh2AU7fDsTvyH8=; b=RIonYpJx5qXsta26JN22wcYncKjseWfrNu1f6mABq/1Dtl6Xr5iB+Gv2 w+irm4RBSmmrG4S1f9ovpUs+J5qLvVqlKIxUyTVEflnbuQPslR4MokcjD QJmQ4JTrX+rPy17N86l4BITv18T5mX6tTcDG1IflhXotRBUXk1/78xCKV I=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,360,1635199200"; d="scan'208";a="5631852" Received: from tomate.loria.fr (HELO tomate) ([152.81.10.51]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2022 09:22:19 +0100 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 09:22:19 +0100 Message-Id: From: Paul Zimmermann To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Accuracy of Mathematical Functions X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: vincenzo.innocente@cern.ch Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces+e=80x24.org@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" Hi, with the release of GNU libc 2.35, we have published a new version of our comparison of the accuracy of mathematical libraries: https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/papers/accuracy.pdf For the GNU libc, with respect to 2.34, we observed an improvement in j0f, tgamma, hypot, hypotl and hypotf128. With respect to the previous update, we compare two new libraries: LLVM libc and ROCm. Paul Zimmermann