From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 808E120248 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 11:47:54 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=jcPa5EWZBChDqV0KpfO1giKmnRppmrlfnXgA4b+Eg7u 6JEQtA20nH/fIPelrtFLcu7xIqtteLSE2rm3bm9bBpUB0RM73TlHjTwZOG3W3h/5 BPI6tm2topCkNQ2j2bJLji2rTBiobzWbmEsOWChtz2poPK5VhNQc0r4lE6d4y4Wo = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=s5ozjwMldNCiN3KYp4qSsS6QnhY=; b=XKePaoaj6vhj8axXa VJdeb5E4VrG926JNApJ18sJXubC0hsslJcVN94rVL6cH6dFoc0/I8F7wJcFjn7rn v1HDeP0D7j5j9eZumYXPyuFE9bUrWd1zFeeBKMeE4NsOVCwvnOtwAHVkdY8q7mgg tckRLjVxMZhtYXClLEixY41EZI= Received: (qmail 33284 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2019 11:47:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 33268 invoked by uid 89); 18 Mar 2019 11:47:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: mx1.suse.de From: Andreas Schwab To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Respect CPPFLAGS when generating stdio-lim.h References: X-Yow: SHHHH!! I hear SIX TATTOOED TRUCK-DRIVERS tossing ENGINE BLOCKS into empty OIL DRUMS.. Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:47:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Palmer Dabbelt's message of "Mon, 18 Mar 2019 04:06:20 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mär 18 2019, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > I'm checking via build-many-glibc.py to make sure this builds, but as > that never sets CPPFLAGS I don't think it'll find any potential issues. Since CPPFLAGS is always set by our makefiles I don't understand this comment. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."