From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C232020248 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:51:24 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=GInyJoJjaP1EwvSI5fPXk4U7EUsboIFIVl3NQ+p/DKBdbT3hSXlvL ssfxVpPRx/94XH5A4D5a6yayIzesUlbFI7Soj5OpYZRhkr6pWnVpT6qwfjOc1J/Q NuLUb2re9teujyK0cKJBWqEEAw02kkLlkSUJfU4XfJvY7kG8ht/IYQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=v2l63hARpYCtArUhqMDgh5MreUI=; b=YFU50DWXvo7hrnwfO1U6WA3jqRFd QIakGnAtyRqAqcaCtwaUK9y0QrS1oypwHHC43rSE7LLb62/R9UpF6UPEhcFrk5s8 ZXM263uQoz7Eou9jjxiUa/yzfzJS8NvrnLL56cJ75L2xrpwq2pYbYgRoD0n+f6Ck Qt5pzTMpPkMeoV4= Received: (qmail 18933 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2019 12:51:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 18910 invoked by uid 89); 18 Mar 2019 12:51:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: mail-pg1-f193.google.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yvJpxICzuGNGrkRvBMv8GcY8ch7pFqnep6rglXmSsO0=; b=YfkgxnDFH+cciZ0zB/bxsbVx+YPFlj3N1CtRblQpcHUOOI7NKQFfsZazi3nPmLL+01 9ivNAEWWEcQFNrF3ywOEZpUf9/wJJd/Rg4+B0S8lVRVCBQ1247lfZJDJIl6R24W/ITFU LoppK43jjYbN3JCMKFlwktQqvGq0azz6dE6zJaeyNNsW78KZc4Mf6A2efbpsW+mlOWvP 23wkI7nKVmST1cq/ag3n3N1HX2uH9nF8VH6fLceDg881bV+Oft3OtPZcpxOklO+RvlPl 068zPmbaX+OUlG8oVhLKooOM1NUCBLGAfgf/k+TVF1/FL7GaMaTSUTl5fLErDO1t5aQR 2GSQ== Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 05:51:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 05:51:07 PDT (-0700) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Respect CPPFLAGS when generating stdio-lim.h In-Reply-To: CC: libc-alpha@sourceware.org From: Palmer Dabbelt To: schwab@suse.de Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 05:11:26 PDT (-0700), schwab@suse.de wrote: > On Mär 18 2019, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > >> My point is that bulid-many-glibcs.py isn't adding any additional >> CPPFLAGS, so we wouldn't notice anything that might crop up because of how >> users (who may have set some odd CPPFLAGS) build their glibc. >> >> Maybe that's being too paranoid, though? > > Users setting CPPFLAGS need to be careful anyway. OK, makes sense. I'll figure out what's going on with build-many-glibcs.py. Thanks!