From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS17314 8.43.84.0/22 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84D9C1F8C6 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 13:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BDB3982409 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 13:42:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B1BDB3982409 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1628084564; bh=FIpXpYjTVSU35OqM/9XwzM97HAvpv5djX7tCsTbgCak=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=wafrvmVstb08ArZa1MUQ1IcKz1+0LyA5QitcJ76Iu2ZLhbssGN8SOp237lnYYhOpp 0Elwn8yXUtkIuZHpi328uOLf1RnvHo+81mUzRYBZCsrXLQdt+107v1rFW5VCOSzbRB d1LN0VHVsBMoCZzZ/fSV60CFKURlXE1ziNkiQLAo= Received: from mail-pj1-x1035.google.com (mail-pj1-x1035.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1035]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6081A3982406 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 13:41:40 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6081A3982406 Received: by mail-pj1-x1035.google.com with SMTP id l19so3080257pjz.0 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 06:41:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FIpXpYjTVSU35OqM/9XwzM97HAvpv5djX7tCsTbgCak=; b=J9bwLmo9lmY11zGw8EHDpEV+wyaD+N72Xllq0LWkT98YVsyqY/aDY9e9tLAcymIf/F fnWZTusYpM5vIa/jEBtuZqIjGBTPQKo2RIPSWOcV8vj5IsPCevobcsh1iFNB/51cjVSq DsKVmmoWToDnDrqBrtxx2nc677YCFhmzgfv89ED0k7xDwQLjyltzGaBSLH7f85OOwaCI dQ3mbHzkXHigLEmgvggDdX/3i0Grm9u2SDU0xpywKQLjlCjEexLttL7tGWDYw5D2U2fs 8vR1IdbyS/e4kj5NMa9Mt1K+NNEtseLXL6TTk1SK+UxzWvOI4l8h5DOUt4L1noFVV3st FnfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5337ZOvzqMaUYUm04F4SxF+PoBGRdqutZamUHeEwPjNWDCeNyxkj kix/DxTEILboPvr4hbj0MRUF70b8XtAlFQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybN5VXBOmOamu6tQbGnKpgHuINsIeo/tHrbCEAbtC4rCJpvgV4ue26wNtUV52nU1HfyfskvQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:188e:b029:3c3:1142:15f2 with SMTP id x14-20020a056a00188eb02903c3114215f2mr11066254pfh.36.1628084499295; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 06:41:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2804:431:c7ca:76cd:ebc7:4201:855e:55a1? ([2804:431:c7ca:76cd:ebc7:4201:855e:55a1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f15sm3287428pgv.92.2021.08.04.06.41.38 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 06:41:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: glibc 2.34 To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <20210802111645.GG14854@arm.com> <87mtq0qd16.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 10:41:37 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87mtq0qd16.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha Reply-To: Adhemerval Zanella Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces+e=80x24.org@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" On 02/08/2021 08:52, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote: > * Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha: > >> The 08/02/2021 10:44, Paul Zimmermann wrote: >>> I just compiled GNU libc 2.34 on my workstation (Intel Core i5 under >>> Debian GNU/Linux 11 bullseye with gcc 10.2.1) and got 3 errors with >>> make check: >>> >>> Summary of test results: >>> 3 FAIL >>> 4439 PASS >>> 20 UNSUPPORTED >>> 16 XFAIL >>> 2 XPASS >>> >>> FAIL: io/tst-closefrom >>> FAIL: misc/tst-close_range >>> FAIL: posix/tst-spawn5 >>> >>> $ cat io/tst-closefrom.out >>> tst-closefrom.c:38: numeric comparison failure >>> left: 95 (0x5f); from: xopen ("/dev/null", O_RDONLY, 0600) >>> right: 93 (0x5d); from: lowfd + i >> >> i see similar failure when the shell where i run >> the tests has inherited fds open (e.g. in this >> case fd 93 and 94) > > Right, we saw that internally as well. I think we need a support/ > utility that returns the maximum open file descriptor, plus 1, and > raises RLIMIT_NOFILE if necessary. I will take care of this.