From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60AEA1F597 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 14:04:26 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=BeRJajShvK0v9jKl RnfLYYlN+PysZqFF7hdxGs86OIwf2kM+gUzb7lddzqiWDyQ1SiCfwHXOkAry3eR8 LzcMug/fq/TvQrbFFuwlVNjT14EQosNbSzmpWIb4rMfmMiWgCWk8Ox1L6uV6Dbps hUUv1FhDwP4l0FqAXJ95FeqhckQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=NK40Nglf6gsD18x1sLSgSs gxtaQ=; b=e4vCD43viSCDxq23MQRbGwXkjwT9yPO/vCi3PzdSxmDpkK2Z1spTGX nmSjGkrd/pufXnBaFm3nia5tXYRAxb37/nMU7y8YFKVY+yMeM5jrvcr37X54Qyxy fdQdJ28DmIHv0vQzN1yVrmU3j7KbSwo6KxHC0KClmuW4lgIGoukw4= Received: (qmail 89258 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2018 14:04:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 89151 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jul 2018 14:04:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: mail-qt0-f196.google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for ISO C threads.h To: Rical Jasan , Adhemerval Zanella Cc: Joseph Myers , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Florian Weimer References: <1517591084-11347-1-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <203a3def-74d0-fa66-9792-a587a089a359@linaro.org> <46c7b370-f98d-30a3-9aac-c5e2c5d5e1d0@linaro.org> <00cbaea3-d979-d766-58b1-a4b0822ca678@redhat.com> <15084ee5-8fb2-677c-376d-1647b46623de@2c3t.io> From: Carlos O'Donell Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 10:04:17 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <15084ee5-8fb2-677c-376d-1647b46623de@2c3t.io> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/20/2018 09:54 AM, Rical Jasan wrote: > Should we really be saying "ISO C11" threads everywhere? Would it be > appropriate to just say "ISO C"? (I'm thinking about future ISO CXX > standards also having specifications for threads.) I'd prefer ISO C threads for more formal discussions, with C threads, as opposed to POSIX threads, for less formal. -- Cheers, Carlos.