From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [IPv6:2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8E041F8C6 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 18:24:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1743858039 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 18:24:55 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1E1743858039 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1631730295; bh=MVxNJWHvH6tzv+RbkX5+vxzEZJCLbTIgz5OVKwb81LU=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=LsfALBp1L0hInkJY4xXjFi/LVvTY0m+3Pb+OauD9k5Z/hngeYd+yVXTVC0RvXrjrL /0uQXbIR8QgTeV9caiO3Tb7EpOIAc8S9rKZurS/f8TktcAe6at8mAhFHkkRnHxDyyJ Ik3IqVBo4wgpN9C1InANWjB5O1SX+1mXtNXeGn9c= Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk (bhuna.collabora.co.uk [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e3e3]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F20DC3858C39 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 18:24:35 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org F20DC3858C39 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: tonyk) with ESMTPSA id 9E3501F41F5A Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 15:24:27 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] futex: splitup and waitv syscall Content-Language: en-US To: Peter Zijlstra References: <20210915140710.596174479@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20210915140710.596174479@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: =?utf-8?q?Andr=C3=A9_Almeida_via_Libc-alpha?= Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=c3=a9_Almeida?= Cc: dave@stgolabs.net, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, dvhart@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, kernel@collabora.com, krisman@collabora.com Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces+e=80x24.org@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" Às 11:07 de 15/09/21, Peter Zijlstra escreveu: > Hi, > > Neither Thomas nor myself much liked that futex2.c nor do we think that CONFIG_ > symbol makes much sense. > > However, futex.c is a wee bit long and splitting it up makes sense. So I've > taken the liberty to replace your initial patch with 15 of my own and then > rebased the remaining patches on top of that. > > Thomas, does something like this work for you? > I tested this patchset: - On top of a full distro - Using futex kselftests - Running glibc's nptl tests, all 387 passed It seems that things are working as expected. You can add my Reviewed-by: André Almeida for patches 01 - 15.