From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on starla X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2599A1F44D for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 22:03:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=cs.wisc.edu header.i=@cs.wisc.edu header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=csl-2018021300 header.b=TIFpawcN; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3100E3858C66 for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 22:03:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout2.cs.wisc.edu (smtpout2.cs.wisc.edu [128.105.6.54]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B717A3858401 for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 22:03:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B717A3858401 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=cs.wisc.edu Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cs.wisc.edu ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org B717A3858401 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=128.105.6.54 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713650587; cv=none; b=JoAq7abO8bKoHSmSpAfhAbWso6coHV7o/YHXEpOO+LYOgzbs6RVs71tWoR6yzbYvI4MhgLZmttvxpj8CK8tXsXGr/71bCAdnqKl+EF/8wMFLaK6vLrSoIe5fyKIK5kk9P+J1ZYrg2CJuorydRvbb7kjUpkjReUh9f1WYPmwOAIg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713650587; c=relaxed/simple; bh=r7vbDs6JvTekZbTVC3GQeNaF7Ng4FA9DoRr0a/aAHoY=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=hQkOr5OQErvvKYgWzf1o8515PMcs9Q0mz+3nhpV51aerV8SeSDTM1zehKJ3c/i/U+fGsHHwzHRXWZLGOBCSf1rfGQbhh6HQjkNEfLvYFFwZoa/acZ0hSUzdVuIhEQ3t05KclqhzMazE/ClzHwz7CR5RmWlv3QrvhaLz0qxUJl3E= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from alumni.cs.wisc.edu (alumni.cs.wisc.edu [128.105.2.11]) by flint.cs.wisc.edu (8.14.7/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 43KM31Nb011130; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 17:03:02 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 flint.cs.wisc.edu 43KM31Nb011130 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.wisc.edu; s=csl-2018021300; t=1713650582; bh=zWBYcxtogjdFJw5wpllDVFTf7BcDWuyZ0qT9MI0QIlw=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TIFpawcN/t7K89tTtWr6c1mc9RnDYMvOPTxsNUmiCDhe0Bmde7oOXiuUdToAgd9LP gmhf9h7F3cPosBK1l1hET5SQWvtNev7jv1T/fR7DV3SAhtbJXOlei+W3oaWLMYWfED DgJ6tGKEA3E8J2wJh8t1ouBBHR55vKkabFnhZw/oBandQfDoQRdVGgShT/fx6qsWTv FEf/DEkZdSzcJ0RC5zu4UCY627ny1RYMU+7gMtIVQ/E7ub17Qe2HnWCoaQ8eFHIq5F tBslWB+kOvWK1C1ELvEIZukCKIs6CHiyZ2ZwWmcC2yCWr0U7/PTwCGhVhQaCFmcQ18 wQWEfCYmbae8Q== Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alumni.cs.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDC61E0849; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 17:03:01 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 17:04:48 -0500 (CDT) From: Carl Edquist To: Chet Ramey cc: Zachary Santer , bug-bash , libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Examples of concurrent coproc usage? In-Reply-To: <988caeb1-b79d-4ba6-be04-5f0c578f71ee@case.edu> Message-ID: References: <9831afe6-958a-fbd3-9434-05dd0c9b602a@draigBrady.com> <317fe0e2-8cf9-d4ac-ed56-e6ebcc2baa55@cs.wisc.edu> <8c490a55-598a-adf6-67c2-eb2a6099620a@cs.wisc.edu> <88a67f36-2a56-a838-f763-f55b3073bb50@lando.namek.net> <988caeb1-b79d-4ba6-be04-5f0c578f71ee@case.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces+e=80x24.org@sourceware.org On Wed, 17 Apr 2024, Chet Ramey wrote: > Yes, I agree that coprocs should survive being suspended. The most > recent devel branch push has code to prevent the coproc being reaped if > it's stopped and not terminated. Oh, nice! :) Carl