unofficial mirror of libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dynarray: Implement remove function
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 17:48:09 +0300 (MSK)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.20.13.1802071744380.25773@monopod.intra.ispras.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1518008967-8310-2-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>

On Wed, 7 Feb 2018, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:

> This patch implements the remove item function for dynarray array.
> It is a costly operation, since it requires a memory move operation
> possible as large as the array size less one element.

If preserving order is not required, then removing an element is as
cheap as moving only the last element to the position of the removed.

If order preservation, is, in fact, part of the intended interface,
then shouldn't the new function be named like '..._ordered_remove'
to reflect that?

Alexander


  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-07 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-07 13:09 [PATCH 1/3] Refactor Linux ARCH_FORK implementation Adhemerval Zanella
2018-02-07 13:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] dynarray: Implement remove function Adhemerval Zanella
2018-02-07 14:48   ` Alexander Monakov [this message]
2018-02-07 16:06     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-02-07 13:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] Refactor atfork handlers Adhemerval Zanella
2018-02-07 15:07   ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-07 17:16     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-02-08  8:32       ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-08 12:50         ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-02-20 11:29           ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-20 13:00             ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-02-20 13:05               ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-20 13:27                 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-02-20 13:42                   ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-20 13:48                     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-02-20 13:58                       ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-20 14:23                         ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-02-23 10:41                           ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-23 12:10                             ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-02-27  8:25                               ` Florian Weimer
2018-03-07 16:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] Refactor Linux ARCH_FORK implementation Adhemerval Zanella
2018-03-08 12:05 ` Florian Weimer
2018-03-08 12:58   ` Adhemerval Zanella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.20.13.1802071744380.25773@monopod.intra.ispras.ru \
    --to=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).