From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS17314 8.43.84.0/22 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E83F1F8C8 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 15:54:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154AD383941E for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 15:54:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from esa2.mentor.iphmx.com (esa2.mentor.iphmx.com [68.232.141.98]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E34D385AC30 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 15:54:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 5E34D385AC30 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codesourcery.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mentor.com IronPort-SDR: tr2nrNcOI/pnhLagFBWR+VqU6MMyq0jnYu+h/9bo9rVio7UPEB/XtjJrNn74DZmYo9VQjhIHXC YgUJv1J/Unx2KpMy8eikTh5TN1vPhVXC9jPZEM2C8P0bcbz7KKU8N8tCc1bhBZbIh2LeiqqJCs fyCzvn/y9b1LN6EiLHCxG89GbjAZTjfwWrhemj2vb8RVR725kRy8Jf8wqqSGVSpEvjqNOst2iX CsivdRJGvI891s0g4YE66DGkFcU22Isic70hdQctMvnSABXbNsUp7lvcRslb8zvcViqVhFNNC5 +3klEbfrk0bnIzlSbJ37OcNx X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,272,1624348800"; d="scan'208";a="65549327" Received: from orw-gwy-02-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.167]) by esa2.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 06 Sep 2021 07:54:19 -0800 IronPort-SDR: CQD7QaViLyC3hDSW4RoDsVAjctRK06z5ySs3KF6JSOn7+z6+g6tx4ouKmCvx9rUizeEni4n+wS 44OfZgZnUjwVlN3nzlA09oSq2eTJb7Rv4w0VSU2kPETAQxfldW4I8ITQqz5pJtlDy2gQw0E+8E j34H5lxzxjuv03keLQ3rOtwz9ZDTTSrGzNwPkFUquAukIOaU78R5U49FPIrCSc/YyvVEX1WN0l 5OX6TDRDWrKGgIC7QZbD4XdbDYEyXJ9/xNIPeokjvFEVE9VTw5tbywhAicqou3dg1hGV/soUaF 47Q= Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 15:54:14 +0000 From: Joseph Myers X-X-Sender: jsm28@digraph.polyomino.org.uk To: Florian Weimer Subject: Re: [PATCH] AArch64: Update A64FX memset not to degrade at 16KB In-Reply-To: <87ilze2po3.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20210827050304.543471-1-naohirot@fujitsu.com> <20210903150156.GF21740@arm.com> <87ilze2po3.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.90] X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) To svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Szabolcs Nagy , naohirot--- via Libc-alpha , Wilco Dijkstra Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces+e=80x24.org@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" On Mon, 6 Sep 2021, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote: > Unfortunately, we do not have much control over the mailing list > configuration (to make “git am” work) or the commit hooks (to prevent > people from pushing such changes). Sorry about that. We do have sufficient control over the git hooks. You can set commit-extra-checker (in refs/meta/config:project.config) to point to a script that applies such checks to commits. See /git/gcc.git/hooks-bin/commit_checker for example; that includes code: # Reject commits applied via "git am" with list email address as # the author. if author_email in ('gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org', 'libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org', 'fortran@gcc.gnu.org'): error('When applying a patch from a mailing list, make sure ' 'to use the original name and email address of the patch ' 'author, not the list email address with "via Gcc-patches".') These checks are only applied to commits new to the repository, not commits new to a particular branch but already present in the repository, so applying stricter checks to new commits on particular branches can be trickier (see ), but for this particular issue a branch-independent check should suffice. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com